- Integration of CiNii Books functions for fiscal year 2025 has completed
- Trial version of CiNii Research Knowledge Graph Search feature is available on CiNii Labs
- 【Updated on November 26, 2025】Regarding the recording of “Research Data” and “Evidence Data”
- Incorporated Jxiv preprints from JaLC and adding coverage from NDL Search
Opposing Role of NMDA Receptor GluN2B and GluN2D in Somatosensory Development and Maturation
Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- Opposing role of NMDA receptor GluN2B and GluN2D in somatosensory development and maturati
- Published
- 2014-08-27
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Rights Information
-
- Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported
- DOI
-
- 10.1523/jneurosci.1811-14.2014
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
Search this article
Description
Development of correct topographical connections between peripheral receptors and central somatosensory stations requires activity-dependent synapse refinement, in which the NMDA type of glutamate receptors plays a key role. Here we compared functional roles of GluN2B (GluR epsilon 2 or NR2B) and GluN2D (GluR epsilon 4 or NR2D), two major regulatory subunits of neonatal NMDA receptors, in development of whisker-related patterning at trigeminal relay stations. Compared with control littermates, both the appearance of whisker-related patterning and the termination of the critical period, as assessed by unilateral infraorbital nerve transection, were delayed by nearly a day in the somatosensory cortex of GluN2B(+/-) mice but advanced by nearly a day in GluN2D(-/-) mice. Similar temporal shifts were found at subcortical relay stations in the thalamus and brainstem of GluN2B(+/-) and GluN2D(-/-) mice. In comparison, the magnitude of lesion-induced critical period plasticity in the somatosensory cortex, as assessed following row-C whisker removal, was normal in both mutants. Thus, GluN2B and GluN2D play counteractive roles in temporal development and maturation of somatosensory maps without affecting the magnitude of critical period plasticity. To understand the opposing action, we then examined neuronal and synaptic expressions of the two subunits along the trigeminal pathway. At each trigeminal station, GluN2B was predominant at asymmetrical synapses of non-GABAergic neurons, whereas GluN2D was selective to asymmetrical synapses of GABAergic neurons. Together, our findings suggest that GluN2B expressed at glutamatergic synapses on glutamatergic projection neurons facilitates refinement of ascending pathway synapses directly, whereas GluN2D expressed at glutamatergic synapses on GABAergic interneurons delays it indirectly.
Journal
-
- Journal of Neuroscience
-
Journal of Neuroscience 34 (35), 11534-11548, 2014-08-27
Society for Neuroscience
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1050025031479078016
-
- NII Article ID
- 120005553664
-
- ISSN
- 15292401
- 02706474
-
- HANDLE
- 2115/58008
-
- PubMed
- 25164652
-
- Text Lang
- en
-
- Article Type
- journal article
-
- Data Source
-
- IRDB
- Crossref
- CiNii Articles
- KAKEN
- OpenAIRE
