Autonomous Systems in Anesthesia: Where Do We Stand in 2020? A Narrative Review

  • Cédrick Zaouter
    Department of Anesthesia, McGill University, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Alexandre Joosten
    Department of Anesthesiology & Intensive Care, Hôpital De Bicêtre, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
  • Joseph Rinehart
    Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Care, University of California-Irvine (UCI), Irvine, California
  • Michel M. R. F. Struys
    Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
  • Thomas M. Hemmerling
    Department of Anesthesia, McGill University, Division of Experimental Surgery, Arnold and Blema Steinberg McGill Simulation Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

説明

<jats:p>As most of us are aware, almost every facet of our society is becoming, for better or worse, progressively more technology-dependent. Technological advancement has made autonomous systems, also known as robots, an integral part of our life in several fields, including medicine. The application of robots in anesthesia could be classified into 3 types of robots. The first ones are pharmacological robots. These robots are based on closed-loop systems that allow better-individualized anesthetic drug titration for optimal homeostasis during general anesthesia and sedation. Recent evidence also demonstrates that autonomous systems could control hemodynamic parameters proficiently outperforming manual control in the operating room. The second type of robot is mechanical. They enable automated motorized reproduction of tasks requiring high manual dexterity level. Such robots have been advocated to be more accurate than humans and, thus, could be safer for the patient. The third type is a cognitive robot also known as decision support system. This type of robot is able to recognize crucial clinical situation that requires human intervention. When these events occur, the system notifies the attending clinician, describes relevant related clinical observations, proposes pertinent therapeutic options and, when allowed by the attending clinician, may even administer treatment. It seems that cognitive robots could increase patients’ safety. Robots in anesthesia offer not only the possibility to free the attending clinicians from repetitive tasks but can also reduce mental workload allowing them to focus on tasks that require human intelligence such as analytical and clinical approach, lifesaving decision-making capacity, and interpersonal interaction. Nevertheless, further studies have yet to be done to test the combination of these 3 types of robots to maintain simultaneously the homeostasis of multiple biological variables and to test the safety of such combination on a large-scale population.</jats:p>

収録刊行物

  • Anesthesia & Analgesia

    Anesthesia & Analgesia 130 (5), 1120-1132, 2020-05

    Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

被引用文献 (1)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ