- 【Updated on May 12, 2025】 Integration of CiNii Dissertations and CiNii Books into CiNii Research
- Trial version of CiNii Research Knowledge Graph Search feature is available on CiNii Labs
- 【Updated on June 30, 2025】Suspension and deletion of data provided by Nikkei BP
- Regarding the recording of “Research Data” and “Evidence Data”
The effects of two different types of bandage contact lenses on the healthy canine eye
-
- Barbara Katharina Braus
- Tierklinik Hofheim Katharina Kemmler Straße 7 65719 Hofheim Germany
-
- Daniela Riedler
- Tierklinik Hofheim Katharina Kemmler Straße 7 65719 Hofheim Germany
-
- Alexander Tichy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences University of Veterinary Medicine Veterinärplatz 1 1210 Vienna Austria
-
- Joachim Spergser
- Institute of Microbiology University of Veterinary Medicine Veterinärplatz 1 1210 Vienna Austria
-
- Ilse Schwendenwein
- Clinical Pathology Platform University of Veterinary Medicine Veterinärplatz 1 1210 Vienna Austria
Search this article
Description
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>To compare two types of bandage contact lenses on the healthy canine eye.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Animals studied</jats:title><jats:p>Six healthy Beagles.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Procedures</jats:title><jats:p>Two different types of bandage contact lenses (single sized human silicone contact lens ‘PureVision 2’ (Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, Rochester, NY, USA) and specially designed veterinary hydrogel contact lens ‘AcriVet Pat D’ (Bausch & Lomb Incorporated) were placed in 12 eyes of healthy Beagle dogs. Retention times and the effects of the lenses regarding irritation of the eye, changes in tear production, impact of contact lenses on tonometric readings, and cytologic and microbiological alterations of the canine eye were investigated.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Mean retention times for veterinary hydrogel lenses with special dimensions were significantly shorter (2 days) than for one size human silicon lenses (8.8 days). Irritation scores were overall low for both types of lenses apart from one human lens causing severe irritation and keratoconjunctivitis as a sequel to folding and displacement. Tear production remained stable in human contact lenses. Intraocular pressure readings with a contact lens in place were only slightly altered; the most accurate readings were obtained through a human lens with an applanation tonometer. Cytology revealed a slight, nonsignificant increase in neutrophilic granulocytes with both types of lenses; the microflora did not change significantly.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Discussion</jats:title><jats:p>Human silicone lenses have significantly longer retention times and are less expensive than veterinary hydrogel lenses. In regard to irritation, bacterial growth and inflammation, both types of lenses can be recommended for use in canine eyes.</jats:p></jats:sec>
Journal
-
- Veterinary Ophthalmology
-
Veterinary Ophthalmology 21 (5), 477-486, 2018-02-06
Wiley
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1360021394460619136
-
- ISSN
- 14635224
- 14635216
-
- Data Source
-
- Crossref