Paucity of high‐quality studies reporting on salt and health outcomes from the science of salt: A regularly updated systematic review of salt and health outcomes (April 2017 to March 2018)

  • Kristina S. Petersen
    Department of Nutritional Sciences Pennsylvania State University University Park Pennsylvania
  • Sarah Rae
    Faculty of Health Sciences The University of Ontario Institute of Technology Oshawa Ontario Canada
  • Erik Venos
    Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada
  • Daniela Malta
    Department of Nutritional Science, Faculty of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
  • Kathy Trieu
    The George Institute for Global Health University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia
  • Joseph Alvin Santos
    The George Institute for Global Health University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia
  • Sudhir Raj Thout
    George Institute for Global Health India Hyderabad India
  • Jacqui Webster
    The George Institute for Global Health University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia
  • Norm R. C. Campbell
    Department of Medicine, Physiology and Pharmacology and Community Health Sciences O'Brien Institute for Public Health and Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada
  • JoAnne Arcand
    Faculty of Health Sciences The University of Ontario Institute of Technology Oshawa Ontario Canada

説明

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The purpose of this review is to identify, summarize, and critically appraise studies on dietary salt and health outcomes that were published from April 2017 to March 2018. The search strategy was adapted from a previous systematic review on dietary salt and health. Identified studies were screened based on a priori defined criteria to identify publications eligible for detailed critical appraisals. Overall, 6747 citations were identified by the search strategy, and 42 health outcome studies were identified. Three of the 42 studies met the criteria for methodological quality and health outcomes and underwent detailed critical appraisals and commentary. In addition, a systematic review and meta‐analysis was critically appraised, although it did not strictly meet our methodological criteria. All four of the studies critically appraised found that sodium reduction improved blood pressure, especially in individuals with hypertension. In addition, sodium reduction reduced albuminuria in patients with stage 1‐3 chronic kidney disease. Examination of the time course of blood pressure responses to sodium reduction revealed lowering sodium in the context of an average American diet may not produce maximal blood pressure reductions within a 4‐week intervention period. This review provides further evidence of the benefit of sodium reduction for blood pressure lowering and gives insights into the subgroups of the population that may derive the greatest benefit from sodium reduction and the time course required to see benefit. Only three high‐quality studies were identified during this 12‐month review period, highlighting the critical need for more well‐conducted rigorous studies in this area.</jats:p>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (1)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ