A First Intercomparison of the Simulated LGM Carbon Results Within PMIP‐Carbon: Role of the Ocean Boundary Conditions

  • F. Lhardy
    Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement CEA‐CNRS‐UVSQ Gif‐sur‐Yvette France
  • N. Bouttes
    Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement CEA‐CNRS‐UVSQ Gif‐sur‐Yvette France
  • D. M. Roche
    Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement CEA‐CNRS‐UVSQ Gif‐sur‐Yvette France
  • A. Abe‐Ouchi
    Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute The University of Tokyo Kashiwa Japan
  • Z. Chase
    University of Tasmania Hobart Australia
  • K. A. Crichton
    School of Geography Exeter University Exeter UK
  • T. Ilyina
    Max Planck Institute for Meteorology Hamburg Germany
  • R. Ivanovic
    University of Leeds Leeds UK
  • M. Jochum
    Niels Bohr Institute University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
  • M. Kageyama
    Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement CEA‐CNRS‐UVSQ Gif‐sur‐Yvette France
  • H. Kobayashi
    Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute The University of Tokyo Kashiwa Japan
  • B. Liu
    Max Planck Institute for Meteorology Hamburg Germany
  • L. Menviel
    Climate Change Research Centre The University of New South Wales Sydney Australia
  • J. Muglia
    Centro para el Estudio de los Sistemas Marinos CONICET Puerto Madryn Argentina
  • R. Nuterman
    Niels Bohr Institute University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
  • A. Oka
    Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute The University of Tokyo Kashiwa Japan
  • G. Vettoretti
    Niels Bohr Institute University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
  • A. Yamamoto
    Japan Agency for Marine‐Earth Science and Technology Yokohama Japan

説明

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Model intercomparison studies of coupled carbon‐climate simulations have the potential to improve our understanding of the processes explaining the <jats:inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="graphic/palo21089-math-0001.png" xlink:title="urn:x-wiley:25724517:media:palo21089:palo21089-math-0001" /> drawdown at the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) and to identify related model biases. Models participating in the Paleoclimate Modeling Intercomparison Project (PMIP) now frequently include the carbon cycle. The ongoing PMIP‐carbon project provides the first opportunity to conduct multimodel comparisons of simulated carbon content for the LGM time window. However, such a study remains challenging due to differing implementation of ocean boundary conditions (e.g., bathymetry and coastlines reflecting the low sea level) and to various associated adjustments of biogeochemical variables (i.e., alkalinity, nutrients, dissolved inorganic carbon). After assessing the ocean volume of PMIP models at the pre‐industrial and LGM, we investigate the impact of these modeling choices on the simulated carbon at the global scale, using both PMIP‐carbon model outputs and sensitivity tests with the iLOVECLIM model. We show that the carbon distribution in reservoirs is significantly affected by the choice of ocean boundary conditions in iLOVECLIM. In particular, our simulations demonstrate a <jats:inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="graphic/palo21089-math-0002.png" xlink:title="urn:x-wiley:25724517:media:palo21089:palo21089-math-0002" /> GtC effect of an alkalinity adjustment on carbon sequestration in the ocean. Finally, we observe that PMIP‐carbon models with a freely evolving <jats:inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="graphic/palo21089-math-0003.png" xlink:title="urn:x-wiley:25724517:media:palo21089:palo21089-math-0003" /> and no additional glacial mechanisms do not simulate the <jats:inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="graphic/palo21089-math-0004.png" xlink:title="urn:x-wiley:25724517:media:palo21089:palo21089-math-0004" /> drawdown at the LGM (with concentrations as high as 313, 331, and 315 ppm), especially if they use a low ocean volume. Our findings suggest that great care should be taken on accounting for large bathymetry changes in models including the carbon cycle.</jats:p>

収録刊行物

参考文献 (61)*注記

もっと見る

関連プロジェクト

もっと見る

問題の指摘

ページトップへ