<scp>Self‐compassion</scp> training for certified nurse assistants in nursing homes

  • Karen Bluth
    Department of Psychiatry University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina United States
  • Christine Lathren
    Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina United States
  • Johanna V. T. Silbersack Hickey
    The Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina United States
  • Sheryl Zimmerman
    The Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina United States
  • Christopher J. Wretman
    The Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina United States
  • Philip D. Sloane
    The Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina United States

説明

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background/Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>Certified nursing assistants (CNAs) who work in nursing homes (NHs) face significant work and personal stress. Self‐compassion training has been shown to decrease stress postintervention in previous studies among healthcare providers and those in helping professions. This study examines the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes of self‐compassion training to address CNA stress and well‐being.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design</jats:title><jats:p>Pre–post intervention.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Setting</jats:title><jats:p>Three mid‐size, nonprofit NHs in North Carolina.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Participants</jats:title><jats:p>Thirty <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CNAs</jats:styled-content>, with a mean age of 49, 96% of whom were female, and 83% black/African American.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Intervention</jats:title><jats:p>In one NH, participants received an 8‐week, 2.5‐h/session (20 h total) group intervention. At the time of recruitment for NHs 2 and 3, a briefer format (6‐week, 1‐h/session; 6 h total) became available and was preferred by CNAs, thus both NHs 2 and 3 participants received a 6‐h group intervention. All interventions occurred in meeting rooms within participating NHs during shift changes.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Measurements</jats:title><jats:p>Intervention attendance, retention, and acceptability; self‐compassion, stress, burnout, depression, and attitudes toward residents with dementia, and job satisfaction pre‐, post‐, 3‐month post‐, and 6‐month postintervention were assessed.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Attendance and program satisfaction were high, and attrition was low for both training formats. Self‐compassion was significantly improved at all time periods (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.001), and stress and depression improved significantly through 3 months (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.05), but not 6 months. No statistically significant change in job satisfaction was noted.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Self‐compassion interventions are feasible and acceptable for CNAs working in NHs and show promise for managing stress and improving well‐being and compassion toward residents. The briefer 6‐h format may maximize participation, while still providing benefits.</jats:p></jats:sec>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (1)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ