{"@context":{"@vocab":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/schema/1.0/","rdfs":"http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#","dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","prism":"http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/basic/2.0/","cinii":"http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ns/1.0/","datacite":"https://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4/","ndl":"http://ndl.go.jp/dcndl/terms/","jpcoar":"https://github.com/JPCOAR/schema/blob/master/2.0/"},"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1361699993758313984.json","@type":"Article","productIdentifier":[{"identifier":{"@type":"DOI","@value":"10.1017/s0033291715001543"}},{"identifier":{"@type":"URI","@value":"https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0033291715001543"}}],"dc:title":[{"@value":"Personality disorder in DSM-5: an oral history"}],"description":[{"type":"abstract","notation":[{"@value":"<jats:p>As the revision process leading to DSM-5 began, the domain of personality disorder embodied the highest aspirations for major change. After an initial prototype-based proposal failed to gain acceptance, the Personality and Personality Disorders Work Group (P&PDWG) developed a hybrid model containing categorical and dimensional components. A clash of perspectives both within the P&PDWG and between the P&PDWG and DSM-5 oversight committees led to the rejection of this proposal from the main body of DSM-5. Major issues included conflicting ways of conceptualizing validation, differences of opinion from personality disorder experts outside the P&PDWG, divergent concepts of the magnitude of evidence needed to support substantial changes, and the disagreements about clinical utility of the hybrid model. Despite these setbacks, the ‘Alternative DSM-5 Model of Personality Disorder’ is presented in Section III of the DSM-5. Further research should clarify its performance relative to the DSM-IV criteria reprinted in the main DSM-5 text.</jats:p>"}]}],"creator":[{"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1381699993758313986","@type":"Researcher","foaf:name":[{"@value":"P. Zachar"}]},{"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1381699993758313984","@type":"Researcher","foaf:name":[{"@value":"R. F. Krueger"}]},{"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1381699993758313985","@type":"Researcher","foaf:name":[{"@value":"K. S. Kendler"}]}],"publication":{"publicationIdentifier":[{"@type":"PISSN","@value":"00332917"},{"@type":"EISSN","@value":"14698978"}],"prism:publicationName":[{"@value":"Psychological Medicine"}],"dc:publisher":[{"@value":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)"}],"prism:publicationDate":"2015-10-20","prism:volume":"46","prism:number":"1","prism:startingPage":"1","prism:endingPage":"10"},"reviewed":"false","dc:rights":["https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms"],"url":[{"@id":"https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0033291715001543"}],"createdAt":"2015-10-20","modifiedAt":"2025-05-31","relatedProduct":[{"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1390848647559558400","@type":"Article","relationType":["isReferencedBy"],"jpcoar:relatedTitle":[{"@language":"en","@value":"Classification and dialogue:"},{"@language":"ja","@value":"分類と対話"},{"@value":"書評論文 分類と対話 : 石原孝二『精神障害を哲学する』書評論文"},{"@language":"ja-Kana","@value":"ショヒョウ ロンブン ブンルイ ト タイワ : イシハラ コウ ニ 『 セイシン ショウガイ オ テツガク スル 』 ショヒョウ ロンブン"}]}],"dataSourceIdentifier":[{"@type":"CROSSREF","@value":"10.1017/s0033291715001543"},{"@type":"CROSSREF","@value":"10.4216/jpssj.53.1_89-1_references_DOI_3Eh8LslMisPRhqmPsbhXDOzj3kB"}]}