{"@context":{"@vocab":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/schema/1.0/","rdfs":"http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#","dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","prism":"http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/basic/2.0/","cinii":"http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ns/1.0/","datacite":"https://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4/","ndl":"http://ndl.go.jp/dcndl/terms/","jpcoar":"https://github.com/JPCOAR/schema/blob/master/2.0/"},"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1361699995374545664.json","@type":"Article","productIdentifier":[{"identifier":{"@type":"DOI","@value":"10.1063/1.357301"}},{"identifier":{"@type":"URI","@value":"https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article-pdf/76/8/4643/18670631/4643_1_online.pdf"}}],"dc:title":[{"@value":"Models for ultrasonic characterization of environmental degradation of interfaces in adhesive joints"}],"description":[{"type":"abstract","notation":[{"@value":"<jats:p>In this paper we discuss two models of environmental degradation of adhesive joints developed from experimental observation of the joint failure mode. It is found that after severe degradation, failure is dominated by the interfacial mode, i.e., by failure at the interface between adhesive and adherend. The fraction of failure in the interfacial mode was found to be related to the joint strength and to be proportional to the frequency shift of a minimum in the spectrum of the reflected ultrasonic signal. One model considers an interface as an interphase in the form of a nonhomogeneous layer composed of two phases: ‘‘soft’’ which is viscoelastic (degraded part of the interphase) and ‘‘stiff’’ corresponding to the nondamaged interphase. Increase of the ‘‘soft’’ phase fraction corresponds to the process of degradation in the interphase. The second model describes degradation in a form of disbonds filled by absorbed water at the interface. The disbonded interface is modeled by transverse spring boundary conditions, with the complex spring stiffness representing the quality of the bond. The influence of different disbond growth scenarios is considered. Advantages and drawbacks of these models are discussed.</jats:p>"}]}],"creator":[{"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1381699995374545664","@type":"Researcher","foaf:name":[{"@value":"A. I. Lavrentyev"}],"jpcoar:affiliationName":[{"@value":"Nondestructive Evaluation Program, The Ohio State University, 190 West 19th Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43210"}]},{"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1381699995374545665","@type":"Researcher","foaf:name":[{"@value":"S. I. Rokhlin"}],"jpcoar:affiliationName":[{"@value":"Nondestructive Evaluation Program, The Ohio State University, 190 West 19th Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43210"}]}],"publication":{"publicationIdentifier":[{"@type":"PISSN","@value":"00218979"},{"@type":"EISSN","@value":"10897550"}],"prism:publicationName":[{"@value":"Journal of Applied Physics"}],"dc:publisher":[{"@value":"AIP Publishing"}],"prism:publicationDate":"1994-10-15","prism:volume":"76","prism:number":"8","prism:startingPage":"4643","prism:endingPage":"4650"},"reviewed":"false","url":[{"@id":"https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article-pdf/76/8/4643/18670631/4643_1_online.pdf"}],"createdAt":"2002-07-26","modifiedAt":"2024-02-02","relatedProduct":[{"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1361975845776022272","@type":"Article","resourceType":"学術雑誌論文(journal article)","relationType":["isReferencedBy"],"jpcoar:relatedTitle":[{"@value":"Effect of interfacial adhesion on the ultrasonic interaction with adhesive joints: A theoretical study using spring-type interfaces"}]}],"dataSourceIdentifier":[{"@type":"CROSSREF","@value":"10.1063/1.357301"},{"@type":"CROSSREF","@value":"10.1121/1.5111856_references_DOI_HmNU2pca0hdQwkO3GFdm2fcwMeK"}]}