{"@context":{"@vocab":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/schema/1.0/","rdfs":"http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#","dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","prism":"http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/basic/2.0/","cinii":"http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ns/1.0/","datacite":"https://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4/","ndl":"http://ndl.go.jp/dcndl/terms/","jpcoar":"https://github.com/JPCOAR/schema/blob/master/2.0/"},"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1362262944484574848.json","@type":"Article","productIdentifier":[{"identifier":{"@type":"DOI","@value":"10.1257/aer.99.1.385"}},{"identifier":{"@type":"URI","@value":"https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdf/10.1257/aer.99.1.385"}}],"dc:title":[{"@value":"Risk, Ambiguity, and the Rank-Dependence Axioms"}],"description":[{"type":"abstract","notation":[{"@value":"<jats:p> Choice problems in the spirit of Ellsberg (1961) suggest that rank-dependent (“Choquet expected utility”) preferences over subjective gambles might be subject to the same difficulties that Ellsberg's earlier examples posed for subjective expected utility. These difficulties stem from event-separability properties that rank-dependent preferences partially retain from expected utility, and suggest that nonseparable models of preferences might be better at capturing features of behavior that lead to these paradoxes. (JEL D81) </jats:p>"}]}],"creator":[{"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1382262944484574848","@type":"Researcher","foaf:name":[{"@value":"Mark J Machina"}],"jpcoar:affiliationName":[{"@value":"Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093."}]}],"publication":{"publicationIdentifier":[{"@type":"PISSN","@value":"00028282"}],"prism:publicationName":[{"@value":"American Economic Review"}],"dc:publisher":[{"@value":"American Economic Association"}],"prism:publicationDate":"2009-02-01","prism:volume":"99","prism:number":"1","prism:startingPage":"385","prism:endingPage":"392"},"reviewed":"false","url":[{"@id":"https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdf/10.1257/aer.99.1.385"}],"createdAt":"2009-03-23","modifiedAt":"2020-06-02","relatedProduct":[{"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1360004231168823424","@type":"Article","resourceType":"学術雑誌論文(journal article)","relationType":["isReferencedBy"],"jpcoar:relatedTitle":[{"@value":"Nest-monotonic two-stage acts and exponential probability capacities"}]},{"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1360004232290042368","@type":"Article","resourceType":"学術雑誌論文(journal article)","relationType":["isReferencedBy"],"jpcoar:relatedTitle":[{"@value":"Quantum-like model of subjective expected utility"}]},{"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1360016864695140864","@type":"Article","resourceType":"学術雑誌論文(journal article)","relationType":["isReferencedBy"],"jpcoar:relatedTitle":[{"@value":"Concept Formation and Quantum-like Probability from Nonlocality in Cognition"}]},{"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1360302865719470720","@type":"Article","resourceType":"学術雑誌論文(journal article)","relationType":["isReferencedBy"],"jpcoar:relatedTitle":[{"@value":"Choquet operators and belief functions"}]}],"dataSourceIdentifier":[{"@type":"CROSSREF","@value":"10.1257/aer.99.1.385"},{"@type":"CROSSREF","@value":"10.1007/s00199-010-0551-0_references_DOI_KtzSys4PjtplLgCOTYcZdFpasmR"},{"@type":"CROSSREF","@value":"10.1007/s12559-022-09995-1_references_DOI_KtzSys4PjtplLgCOTYcZdFpasmR"},{"@type":"CROSSREF","@value":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2018.02.001_references_DOI_KtzSys4PjtplLgCOTYcZdFpasmR"},{"@type":"CROSSREF","@value":"10.1016/j.jmaa.2023.127497_references_DOI_KtzSys4PjtplLgCOTYcZdFpasmR"}]}