{"@context":{"@vocab":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/schema/1.0/","rdfs":"http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#","dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","prism":"http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/basic/2.0/","cinii":"http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ns/1.0/","datacite":"https://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4/","ndl":"http://ndl.go.jp/dcndl/terms/","jpcoar":"https://github.com/JPCOAR/schema/blob/master/2.0/"},"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1362262946426760192.json","@type":"Article","productIdentifier":[{"identifier":{"@type":"DOI","@value":"10.1002/2014gl060046"}},{"identifier":{"@type":"URI","@value":"https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2F2014GL060046"}},{"identifier":{"@type":"URI","@value":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/2014GL060046"}},{"identifier":{"@type":"URI","@value":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/2014GL060046"}},{"identifier":{"@type":"URI","@value":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/2014GL060046"}}],"dc:title":[{"@value":"The impact of forcing efficacy on the equilibrium climate sensitivity"}],"description":[{"type":"abstract","notation":[{"@value":"<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Estimates of the Earth's equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) from twentieth century observations predict a lower ECS than estimates from climate models, paleoclimate data, and interannual variability. Here we show that estimates of ECS from the twentieth century observations are sensitive to the assumed efficacy of aerosol and ozone forcing (efficacy for a forcer is the amount of warming per unit global average forcing divided by the warming per unit forcing from CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>). Previous estimates of ECS based on the twentieth century observations have assumed that the efficacy is unity, which in our study yields an ECS of 2.3 K (5%–95% confidence range of 1.6–4.1 K), near the bottom of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's likely range of 1.5–4.5 K. Increasing the aerosol and ozone efficacy to 1.33 increases the ECS to 3.0 K (1.9–6.8 K), a value in excellent agreement with other estimates. Forcing efficacy therefore provides a way to bridge the gap between the different estimates of ECS.</jats:p>"}]}],"creator":[{"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1380004236853885829","@type":"Researcher","foaf:name":[{"@value":"J. R. Kummer"}],"jpcoar:affiliationName":[{"@value":"Department of Atmospheric Sciences Texas A&M University  College Station Texas USA"}]},{"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1382262946426760192","@type":"Researcher","foaf:name":[{"@value":"A. E. Dessler"}],"jpcoar:affiliationName":[{"@value":"Department of Atmospheric Sciences Texas A&M University  College Station Texas USA"}]}],"publication":{"publicationIdentifier":[{"@type":"PISSN","@value":"00948276"},{"@type":"EISSN","@value":"19448007"}],"prism:publicationName":[{"@value":"Geophysical Research Letters"}],"dc:publisher":[{"@value":"American Geophysical Union (AGU)"}],"prism:publicationDate":"2014-05-23","prism:volume":"41","prism:number":"10","prism:startingPage":"3565","prism:endingPage":"3568"},"reviewed":"false","dc:rights":["http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor"],"url":[{"@id":"https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2F2014GL060046"},{"@id":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/2014GL060046"},{"@id":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/2014GL060046"},{"@id":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/2014GL060046"}],"createdAt":"2014-05-07","modifiedAt":"2023-10-04","relatedProduct":[{"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1360290617563838976","@type":"Article","resourceType":"学術雑誌論文(journal article)","relationType":["isReferencedBy"],"jpcoar:relatedTitle":[{"@value":"Efficacy of Climate Forcings in PDRMIP Models"}]},{"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/2051996266842852864","@type":"Article","resourceType":"学術雑誌論文(journal article)","relationType":["isReferencedBy"],"jpcoar:relatedTitle":[{"@value":"A review of progress towards understanding the transient global mean surface temperature response to radiative perturbation"}]}],"dataSourceIdentifier":[{"@type":"CROSSREF","@value":"10.1002/2014gl060046"},{"@type":"CROSSREF","@value":"10.1186/s40645-016-0096-3_references_DOI_5FsbJG8tgrRSlVyFcXEryh4KIJE"},{"@type":"CROSSREF","@value":"10.1029/2019jd030581_references_DOI_NFgvcz2HC3ie52vEEXjZJmEceDl"}]}