{"@context":{"@vocab":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/schema/1.0/","rdfs":"http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#","dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","prism":"http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/basic/2.0/","cinii":"http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ns/1.0/","datacite":"https://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4/","ndl":"http://ndl.go.jp/dcndl/terms/","jpcoar":"https://github.com/JPCOAR/schema/blob/master/2.0/"},"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1362544419971801728.json","@type":"Article","productIdentifier":[{"identifier":{"@type":"DOI","@value":"10.1177/0010414017720702"}},{"identifier":{"@type":"URI","@value":"https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0010414017720702"}},{"identifier":{"@type":"URI","@value":"https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1177/0010414017720702"}}],"dc:title":[{"@value":"The Legitimacy of Representation: How Descriptive, Formal, and Responsiveness Representation Affect the Acceptability of Political Decisions"}],"description":[{"type":"abstract","notation":[{"@value":"<jats:p> We examine how descriptive representation, formal representation, and responsiveness affect the legitimacy of political decisions: Who are the representatives, how are they selected, what is the outcome of the decision-making process, and to what extent do these three aspects matter for decision acceptance among the citizens? We examine this from the citizens’ perspective, and ask whether decisions are perceived as more legitimate when they are made by groups that reflect society in certain characteristics and chosen according to certain selection procedures. In a Norwegian survey experiment, we find that people are more willing to accept a decision when it is made by a group of people like them, and who are assigned as decision makers based on their expertise. Descriptive representation also serves as a cushion for unfavorable decisions. Moreover, when asked, the traditionally less advantaged groups tend to value descriptive representation more than other citizens. </jats:p>"}]}],"creator":[{"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1382544419971801729","@type":"Researcher","foaf:name":[{"@value":"Sveinung Arnesen"}],"jpcoar:affiliationName":[{"@value":"University of Bergen, Norway"}]},{"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1382544419971801728","@type":"Researcher","foaf:name":[{"@value":"Yvette Peters"}],"jpcoar:affiliationName":[{"@value":"University of Bergen, Norway"}]}],"publication":{"publicationIdentifier":[{"@type":"PISSN","@value":"00104140"},{"@type":"EISSN","@value":"15523829"}],"prism:publicationName":[{"@value":"Comparative Political Studies"}],"dc:publisher":[{"@value":"SAGE Publications"}],"prism:publicationDate":"2017-08-08","prism:volume":"51","prism:number":"7","prism:startingPage":"868","prism:endingPage":"899"},"reviewed":"false","dc:rights":["https://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license"],"url":[{"@id":"https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0010414017720702"},{"@id":"https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1177/0010414017720702"}],"createdAt":"2017-08-08","modifiedAt":"2025-03-04","relatedProduct":[{"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1360025430635825792","@type":"Article","resourceType":"学術雑誌論文(journal article)","relationType":["isReferencedBy"],"jpcoar:relatedTitle":[{"@value":"How can we accept ‘our’ decisions?: an experimental study on lottocracy, epistocracy, and electoral democracy"}]},{"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1360290617556825216","@type":"Article","resourceType":"学術雑誌論文(journal article)","relationType":["isReferencedBy"],"jpcoar:relatedTitle":[{"@value":"How do political decision-making processes affect the acceptability of decisions? Results from a survey experiment"}]}],"dataSourceIdentifier":[{"@type":"CROSSREF","@value":"10.1177/0010414017720702"},{"@type":"CROSSREF","@value":"10.1017/s1468109924000094_references_DOI_SqtPiv0I2ck59rttt9LG38bjb7G"},{"@type":"CROSSREF","@value":"10.1177/0192512121998250_references_DOI_SqtPiv0I2ck59rttt9LG38bjb7G"}]}