Probiotic Prophylaxis of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia: A Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Trial

  • Lee E. Morrow
    Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska
  • Marin H. Kollef
    Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; and
  • Thomas B. Casale
    Department of Allergy and Immunology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska

書誌事項

公開日
2010-10
権利情報
  • https://academic.oup.com/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights
DOI
  • 10.1164/rccm.200912-1853oc
公開者
Oxford University Press (OUP)

この論文をさがす

説明

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Rationale</jats:title> <jats:p>Enteral administration of probiotics may modify the gastrointestinal environment in a manner that preferentially favors the growth of minimally virulent species. It is unknown whether probiotic modification of the upper aerodigestive flora can reduce nosocomial infections.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Objectives</jats:title> <jats:p>To determine whether oropharyngeal and gastric administration of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG can reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 146 mechanically ventilated patients at high risk of developing VAP. Patients were randomly assigned to receive enteral probiotics (n = 68) or an inert inulin-based placebo (n = 70) twice a day in addition to routine care.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Measurements and Main Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Patients treated with Lactobacillus were significantly less likely to develop microbiologically confirmed VAP compared with patients treated with placebo (40.0 vs. 19.1%; P = 0.007). Although patients treated with probiotics had significantly less Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhea than patients treated with placebo (18.6 vs. 5.8%; P = 0.02), the duration of diarrhea per episode was not different between groups (13.2 ± 7.4 vs. 9.8 ± 4.9 d; P = 0.39). Patients treated with probiotics had fewer days of antibiotics prescribed for VAP (8.6 ± 10.3 vs. 5.6 ± 7.8 d; P = 0.05) and for C. difficile–associated diarrhea (2.1 ± 4.8 SD d vs. 0.5 ± 2.3 d; P = 0.02). No adverse events related to probiotic administration were identified.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>These pilot data suggest that L. rhamnosus GG is safe and efficacious in preventing VAP in a select, high-risk ICU population.</jats:p> <jats:p>Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00613795).</jats:p> </jats:sec>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (3)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ