Development and Evaluation of a Grouping Method for Supporting Collaborative Review of Argumentation in Distance Learning(<Special Issue>Informal Learning in the Information Society)

DOI

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • 通信教育における意見文の協同推敲を支援するグループ編成方法の開発と評価(<特集>情報化社会におけるインフォーマルラーニング)
  • 教育実践研究論文 通信教育における意見文の協同推敲を支援するグループ編成方法の開発と評価
  • キョウイク ジッセン ケンキュウ ロンブン ツウシン キョウイク ニ オケル イケンブン ノ キョウドウスイコウ オ シエン スル グループ ヘンセイ ホウホウ ノ カイハツ ト ヒョウカ

Search this article

Abstract

In this study, the system called "Re:" supporting collaborative review of argumentation written in Japanese are developed for high school students who are native speakers of Japanese. Three viewpoints are set for collaborative review: contents, structure, and language use. Experimental group and control group are compared before and after use of "Re:" system in the score of argumentation. Learners have diversity in their good abilities about three viewpoints in experiment group. Although, there are no diversity in control group. As a result, there is significant difference in whole score in after use condition of experiment group. Additionally, differences in whole scores in each learning group are more constant in experimental group than control group. On the other hand, there are also significant differences between two groups in some evaluation items that have deep relation about quality of facts. Therefore, suggested grouping method might guarantee constant learning effect for more distance learners.

Journal

Keywords

Details

  • CRID
    1390001205228150400
  • NII Article ID
    110009684856
  • NII Book ID
    AA11964147
  • DOI
    10.15077/jjet.kj00008987687
  • ISSN
    21896453
    13498290
  • NDL BIB ID
    025083527
  • Text Lang
    ja
  • Data Source
    • JaLC
    • NDL
    • CiNii Articles
  • Abstract License Flag
    Disallowed

Report a problem

Back to top