原意主義における憲法解釈と憲法構築の区別の意義(抱喜久雄教授追悼号)

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • Significance of the Distinction between Constitutional Interpretation and Constitutional Construction for Originalism(In Memory of Prof. Kikuo KAKAE)
  • 原意主義における憲法解釈と憲法構築の区別の意義
  • ゲンイ シュギ ニ オケル ケンポウ カイシャク ト ケンポウ コウチク ノ クベツ ノ イギ

この論文をさがす

説明

Originalism as a theory of constitutional interpretation has been continuously sophisticated and has elaborated several variants of its methodology. This may owe to the embracement of the concept of the distinction between constitutional interpretation and constitutional construction to originalism itself. It means that the constitutional interpretation/construction distinction might have played a crucial role to improve originalism and that the distinction might have been useful for originalism in that situation. When considered such a contribution of the distinction to originalism in the aggregate, it seems to be highly important to reconfirm the significance of the distinction's content from the viewpoint of divining the future of originalism. Therefore, in this article, I review the meaning of both the constitutional interpretation and the constitutional construction and attempt to inquire the signification of the distinction of them for originalism.

収録刊行物

  • 憲法論叢

    憲法論叢 19 (0), 31-51, 2012

    関西法政治学研究会

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ