{"@context":{"@vocab":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/schema/1.0/","rdfs":"http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#","dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","prism":"http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/basic/2.0/","cinii":"http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ns/1.0/","datacite":"https://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4/","ndl":"http://ndl.go.jp/dcndl/terms/","jpcoar":"https://github.com/JPCOAR/schema/blob/master/2.0/"},"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1390004222615523456.json","@type":"Article","productIdentifier":[{"identifier":{"@type":"DOI","@value":"10.4259/ibk.68.2_791"}},{"identifier":{"@type":"NDL_BIB_ID","@value":"030340927"}},{"identifier":{"@type":"URI","@value":"http://id.ndl.go.jp/bib/030340927"}},{"identifier":{"@type":"URI","@value":"https://ndlsearch.ndl.go.jp/books/R000000004-I030340927"}},{"identifier":{"@type":"URI","@value":"https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/ibk/68/2/68_791/_pdf"}},{"identifier":{"@type":"NAID","@value":"130007899277"}}],"dc:title":[{"@language":"en","@value":"The Development of the Theory of Buddhakāya in Chinese Buddhism and Paramārtha’s Translation of the <i>Mahāyānasaṃgrahabhāṣya </i>摂大乗論釈"},{"@language":"ja","@value":"中国仏教における仏身論の展開と真諦訳『摂大乗論釈』"},{"@language":"ja-Kana","@value":"チュウゴク ブッキョウ ニ オケル ブッシンロン ノ テンカイ ト シンタイ ヤク 『 セツダイジョウロンシャク 』"}],"dc:language":"ja","description":[{"type":"abstract","notation":[{"@language":"en","@value":"<p>Although the theory of <i>buddhakāya</i> (“Buddha-bodies”) in Chinese Buddhism initially adhered to the twofold Buddha-body, the threefold Buddha-body interpretation later became mainstream after being introduced through the translations of Bodhiruci, Ratnamati, and Paramārtha. This subsequently evolved into the concept of the fourfold Buddha-body. As is well known, this theory of <i>buddhakāya</i> was systematized by the scholars Jingyingsi Huiyan 浄影寺慧遠 and Jizang 吉蔵.</p><p>Nevertheless, this system was still essentially that of the twofold Buddha-body, which posited the two bodies of the <i>dharmakāya </i>(“truth body”), which only the Buddha is able to perceive, and the <i>nirmāṇakāya</i> (“transformation body”), which the <i>sattva</i> are also able to perceive. The distinction and differentiation of the <i>buddhakāya </i>were thought to take place according to differences in human capacity among the <i>sattva</i>, or, in other words, the Stages of Practice. This way of thinking seems to have been based on the concept of <i>ganying</i> (感応, literally “stimulus-response” or “cosmic resonance”), a soteriological belief unique to Chinese Buddhism.</p><p>Within this understanding, the interpretation of an intermediate body, the <i>saṃbhogakāya</i> (“body of pleasure”), underwent various changes. For example, in <i>Awakening of Faith in the Mahāyāna </i>(<i>Dasheng qi xin lun </i>大乗起信論) the <i>saṃbhogakāya</i> is regarded as the body of the Buddha, which itself enjoys the fruits of enlightenment and in turn enlightens the <i>sattva</i>. For Jingyingsi Huiyan, on the other hand, the body of the Buddha can be seen in the Pure Land.</p><p>While the <i>saṃbhogakāya </i>was thus initially understood as being closer to either the <i>sattva </i>or Buddha, it came to be thought of as divided into the body of the Buddha which can be seen in the Pure Land, and the body of the Buddha which itself enjoys the fruits of enlightenment, and thus, the fourfold Buddha-body developed. This understanding of the threefold Buddha-body through the lens of the twofold Buddha-body (fourfold Buddha-body) was a development unique to Chinese Buddhism. This development was influenced by Paramārtha’s translation of <i>Mahāyānasaṃgrahabhāṣya</i> (<i>She dasheng lun shi </i>摂大乗論釈), and by Jizang, who used this work to construct his own theories.</p>"}],"abstractLicenseFlag":"disallow"}],"creator":[{"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1410004222615523456","@type":"Researcher","personIdentifier":[{"@type":"NRID","@value":"9000410153869"}],"foaf:name":[{"@language":"en","@value":"Sowa Yoshihiro"},{"@language":"ja","@value":"曽和 義宏"}],"jpcoar:affiliationName":[{"@language":"ja","@value":"佛教大学教授"}]}],"publication":{"publicationIdentifier":[{"@type":"PISSN","@value":"00194344"},{"@type":"EISSN","@value":"18840051"},{"@type":"NDL_BIB_ID","@value":"000000001758"},{"@type":"ISSN","@value":"00194344"},{"@type":"LISSN","@value":"00194344"},{"@type":"NCID","@value":"AN00018579"}],"prism:publicationName":[{"@language":"ja","@value":"印度學佛教學研究"},{"@language":"en","@value":"Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies (Indogaku Bukkyogaku Kenkyu)"},{"@language":"en","@value":"JOURNAL OF INDIAN AND BUDDHIST STUDIES (INDOGAKU BUKKYOGAKU KENKYU)"},{"@language":"en","@value":"jibs"},{"@language":"ja","@value":"印仏研、印度学仏教学研究"},{"@language":"en","@value":"IBK"},{"@language":"ja","@value":"印仏研"},{"@language":"en","@value":"JIBS"}],"dc:publisher":[{"@language":"en","@value":"Japanese Association of Indian and Buddhist Studies"},{"@language":"ja","@value":"日本印度学仏教学会"}],"prism:publicationDate":"2020-03-20","prism:volume":"68","prism:number":"2","prism:startingPage":"791","prism:endingPage":"798"},"reviewed":"false","url":[{"@id":"http://id.ndl.go.jp/bib/030340927"},{"@id":"https://ndlsearch.ndl.go.jp/books/R000000004-I030340927"},{"@id":"https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/ibk/68/2/68_791/_pdf"}],"availableAt":"2020-03-20","foaf:topic":[{"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/all?q=%E4%B8%89%E8%BA%AB%E8%AB%96","dc:title":"三身論"},{"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/all?q=%E5%A0%B1%E8%BA%AB","dc:title":"報身"},{"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/all?q=%E7%9C%9F%E8%AB%A6%E8%A8%B3%E3%80%8E%E6%91%82%E5%A4%A7%E4%B9%97%E8%AB%96%E9%87%88%E3%80%8F","dc:title":"真諦訳『摂大乗論釈』"},{"@id":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/all?q=%E5%90%89%E8%94%B5","dc:title":"吉蔵"}],"dataSourceIdentifier":[{"@type":"JALC","@value":"oai:japanlinkcenter.org:2008008014"},{"@type":"NDL_SEARCH","@value":"oai:ndlsearch.ndl.go.jp:R000000004-I030340927"},{"@type":"CROSSREF","@value":"10.4259/ibk.68.2_791"},{"@type":"CIA","@value":"130007899277"}]}