Co-reading and Co-writing "Can the Subaltern Speak?" : Focusing on the three aspects of Kyosei studies

DOI HANDLE Open Access

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • 『サバルタンは語ることができるか』を共に読み共に書く : 共生学の3 つのアスペクトを中心に
  • サバルタン　ハ　カタルコト　ガ　デキルカ　ヲ　トモニ　ヨミ　トモニ　カク　キョウセイガク　ノ　３ツ　ノ　アスペクト　ヲ　チュウシン　ニ

Description

Research Note

This paper aims to reconsider Spivak's concept of representation (vertretung/ darstellung) from the perspective of the three aspects of kyosei studies (philosophy, art, and science) through a co-reading of her critical book "Can the Subaltern Speak?" (Spivak 1988). Chapter 1 describes how the reading group of "Subaltern" began and focused on how "differences in reading" appeared while aiming to read the contents correctly. In the second chapter, we confirm Spivak's position in "Subaltern" from the perspective of Kyosei philosophy. In doing so, we focus on Spivak's self-reference and explain the importance of introducing the view of the Subaltern continuum. In Chapter 3, I (Fujisaka) narrate my own Subaltern story through an autoethnography of my personal experiences from the art of Kyosei. In Chapter 4, I (Kazusa) reflectively depict the relationship with Subalternity when researching from the perspective of Kyosei science. Finally, by arranging these "differences in readings" as differences in positionality in a circular island model, we examine the relationship between "Subaltern" and myself as a subject of narration.

Journal

  • 未来共創

    未来共創 9 243-275, 2022-03-31

    大阪大学人間科学研究科附属未来共創センター

Related Projects

See more

Keywords

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top