Should Sedative Administration Be Recommended as an Antiarrhythmic Therapy to Suppress Ventricular Fibrillation and Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Electrical Storm? ― A Scoping Review ―
-
- Kitai Takayuki
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Sapporo Cardio Vascular Clinic
-
- Kawaji Tetsuma
- Department of Cardiology, Mitsubishi Kyoto Hospital
-
- Hosaka Yukio
- Department of Cardiology, Niigata City General Hospital
-
- Sangawa Mutsuko
- Department of Cardiology, Takamatsu Red Cross Hospital
-
- Shiomi Hiroki
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine
-
- Hiraoka Eiji
- Department of Internal Medicine, Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Medical Center
-
- Sakamoto Kazuo
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital
-
- Iijima Kenichi
- Department of Cardiovascular Biology and Medicine, Juntendo University Hospital
-
- Yokose Masashi
- Department of Diagnostic and Generalist Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University
-
- Noguchi Teruo
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
-
- Takahashi Hiroshi
- Department of Cardiology, Steel Memorial Muroran Hospital
-
- Matoba Tetsuya
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences
-
- Kikuchi Migaku
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Emergency and Critical Care Center, Dokkyo Medical University
-
- Tahara Yoshio
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
-
- Nonogi Hiroshi
- Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Shizuoka
-
- Funazaki Toshikazu
- Kawaguchi Cupola Rehabilitation Hospital
説明
<p>Background: Electrical storm (ES) is defined as a condition in which ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) episodes requiring electrical shock or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks occur ≥3 times within 24 h. It is a life-threatening condition, and treatment options include antiarrhythmic drugs, sedation, circulatory support, and catheter ablation. Sedation is conventionally performed for repeated electrical shocks; however, evidence for its effectiveness in ES suppression remains limited. This scoping review aimed to assess whether the use of sedatives is beneficial for ES suppression.</p><p>Methods and Results: This scoping review followed the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Three online databases were searched to identify studies published from the inception of each database until September 18, 2024. To date, no randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials or observational analytical studies have met the inclusion criteria for the use of sedation in patients with ES.</p><p>Conclusions: This scoping review underscores the need for high-quality studies to enhance the level of evidence and bridge knowledge gaps, ultimately aiming to shift the care paradigm for patients with ES.</p>
収録刊行物
-
- Circulation Reports
-
Circulation Reports advpub (0), 2025-10-07
一般社団法人 日本循環器学会
- Tweet
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390868748555367168
-
- ISSN
- 24340790
-
- 本文言語コード
- en
-
- データソース種別
-
- JaLC
-
- 抄録ライセンスフラグ
- 使用不可