-
- 北田 暁大
- 東京大学大学院情報学環助教授
書誌事項
- タイトル別名
-
- Pre-Constructionism as Post-Constructionism
- ポスト コウチク シュギ ト シテ ノ プレ コウチク シュギ Weber ト Popper ノ レキシ ホウホウロン オ チュウシン ニ
- On the Methodological Investigation of History
- WeberとPopperの歴史方法論を中心に
この論文をさがす
抄録
The thesis of historical constructionism that the past is constructed by the perspective of the present has impacted historical positivism, which predicates itself on the validity of historical narratives. The questions raised in the fields of cultural studies, postcolonialism, and feminism, such as “How should we evaluate oral history?” “Are all discourses on collective memories political ?” and “How does the narrator's position affect the contents described ?” bear a close relationship to the constructionist approach. It can be said that we cannot write history without the constructionist perspective.<BR>However, we should not conclude that historical positivism is replaced by constructionism because of the former's theoretical inferiority. We had better reconsider that there were elaborate theorization of historical methodology before the emergence of historical constructionism. In this paper, I try to clarify the significance of some traditional issues (such as causality in history and the assumption of rationality) that are hardly discussed in the field of historical constructionism by focusing on Weber and Popper's methodological writings.
収録刊行物
-
- 社会学評論
-
社会学評論 55 (3), 281-297, 2004
日本社会学会
- Tweet
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390282679271799424
-
- NII論文ID
- 110001037546
-
- NII書誌ID
- AN00109823
-
- ISSN
- 18842755
- 00215414
-
- NDL書誌ID
- 7218114
-
- データソース種別
-
- JaLC
- NDL
- Crossref
- CiNii Articles
- KAKEN
-
- 抄録ライセンスフラグ
- 使用不可