- 【Updated on May 12, 2025】 Integration of CiNii Dissertations and CiNii Books into CiNii Research
- Trial version of CiNii Research Knowledge Graph Search feature is available on CiNii Labs
- Suspension and deletion of data provided by Nikkei BP
- Regarding the recording of “Research Data” and “Evidence Data”
Comparative sociology of cinema censorship between Japan and United States before World War
-
- HASE Masato
- Principal Investigator
- Waseda University, School of Literature, Professor
-
- KATO Mikiro
- Co-Investigator
- Kyoto University, Faculty of Integrated Huamn Studies Associate Professor
About This Project
- Japan Grant Number
- JP11610167 (JGN)
- Funding Program
- Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
- Funding Organization
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Kakenhi Information
- Project/Area Number
- 11610167
- Research Category
- Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
- Allocation Type
-
- Single-year Grants
- Review Section / Research Field
-
- Literature > 心理学・社会学・教育学・文化人類学 > 社会学(含社会福祉関係)
- Research Institution
-
- Waseda University
- Chiba University
- Project Period (FY)
- 1999 〜 2000
- Project Status
- Completed
- Budget Amount*help
- 4,100,000 Yen (Direct Cost: 4,100,000 Yen)
Research Abstract
Censorship has been considered as the problem of the repression by the governmental power. However we must deal with this problem from the sociological point of view. Except in periods of national emergency, such as war time, authoritarian forms of censorship, exercised through the monopoly power of the State, have not been prominent features of twentieth-century liberal democracies. Rather self-regulation by the cinema industries was a usual form of film censorship. So censorship was exercised through complex social discourses. For example, Hase analyses the way a film "The Birth of a Nation" was criticized and labeled as racism movie and banned by some state governments in his paper, 'What is the social effect of fictional film? ". Before the regulation of screening by the public agency, this film was 'censored' by social discourses. And Kato analyses the form and content of black movies which have been produced outside Hollywood. Here it was decided by the way of reception by black people. This is, as it were, a censorship. So the problem of censorship must be analyzed as cultural politics.
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1040282256703808896
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Data Source
-
- KAKEN