- 【Updated on May 12, 2025】 Integration of CiNii Dissertations and CiNii Books into CiNii Research
- Trial version of CiNii Research Knowledge Graph Search feature is available on CiNii Labs
- Suspension and deletion of data provided by Nikkei BP
- Regarding the recording of “Research Data” and “Evidence Data”
Confirmation bias in judicial procedures and method for overcoming: Interdisciplinary study of law and psychology
About This Project
- Japan Grant Number
- JP17H02652 (JGN)
- Funding Program
- Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
- Funding Organization
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Kakenhi Information
- Project/Area Number
- 17H02652
- Research Category
- Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
- Allocation Type
-
- Single-year Grants
- Review Section / Research Field
-
- Humanities and Social Sciences > Social Sciences > Psychology > Experimental psychology
- Research Institution
-
- Keio University
- Project Period (FY)
- 2017-04-01 〜 2020-03-31
- Project Status
- Completed
- Budget Amount*help
- 17,680,000 Yen (Direct Cost: 13,600,000 Yen Indirect Cost: 4,080,000 Yen)
Research Abstract
From legal and psychological perspectives, we examined the possibility that the presentation of inappropriate information, such as the video of interrogation of a suspect in a court or the feedback of an investigator to an eyewitness, causes the judges, lay-judges (saiban-in), investigators, or witnesses to have strong hypotheses and to distort (to bias) their memories, their judgments, or decisions of the court in investigations and trials. We also clarified the factors that influence the effects of these information presentations, showed methods to prevent bias, and examined the legal validity of the methods.
Keywords
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1040282256932574464
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Data Source
-
- KAKEN
