憲法解釈の法源としての人権条約 : コモン・ロー諸国における現状

機関リポジトリ Web Site

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • ケンポウ カイシャク ノ ホウゲン ト シテノ ジンケン ジョウヤク コモン ロー ショコク ニ オケル ゲンジョウ
  • HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES AS THE SOURCE FOR CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION THE CASES IN COMMON LAW COUNTRIES

この論文をさがす

抄録

type:text

Common law countries have been applying their traditional dualist orientation to treaties. But recently, Common law judges are beginning to utilize human rights treaties for interpreting Constitution. They are entrenching international treaty obligations into domestic law. This trend is called creeping monism. The interpretive techniques that courts utilize in incorporating human rights treaties into their work are five types: the use of treaties to gild the domestic lily, to develop a rights-conscious Charming Betsy canon for statutory interpretation, to update the common law, to engage in contextual constitutional interpretation and to develop a constitutional Charming Betsy canon. Among common law countries, judges are beginning to utilize incorporated treaties as the sources of constitutional interpretation. This paper aims to examine the cases how common law judges are using incorporated human rights treaties as constitutional interpretation

収録刊行物

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ