文脈主義の新展開 : メタファー分析を通して

機関リポジトリ Web Site オープンアクセス

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • ブンミャク シュギ ノ シンテンカイ : メタファー ブンセキ オ トオシテ
  • Bunmyaku shugi no shintenkai : metafa bunseki o toshite
  • Metaphor, contextualism, and logical form

この論文をさがす

抄録

type:text

Metaphor is far more ubiquitous in language than previously believed. Whereas traditional philosophers of language like Grice took metaphorical meaning to belong to implicature, recent Contextualists, to explain this ubiquity, hold that, as well as literal language, non-literal language including metaphor, metonymy and referential use of definite description can be placed in explicit, truth-conditional content. In this paper, I will examine two Contextualist accounts for non-literal language through their analyses of metaphor. Firstly, Relevance Theorists treat metaphor as a kind of so-called loose use and assume that there is no essential difference between literal language and metaphor in terms of cognitive process. Secondly, formal or semanticist approach posits 'a richer underlying linguistic representation whose meaning will determine the truth-conditions of each metaphorical utterance in context' (Stern(2006), p. 246). After reviewing each approach in detail, I will suggest that the latter can offer a better explanation of how metaphorical meaning is derived and constrained from literal language and indicate a potential of Stern-inspired Contextualism which may treat other non-literal language like metonymy or free enrichment in the same way as metaphor.

投稿論文

収録刊行物

  • 哲學

    哲學 137 89-114, 2016-03

    三田哲學會

関連プロジェクト

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ