Clinical Significance of Qualitative Research as a Field of Narrative Generation: Differences and Overlap of Narrative in Qualitative Research and Psychotherapy

NODA, Miki

Bibliographic Information

Other Title

語りの生成の場としての質的研究の臨床的意義 --臨床心理学における質的研究と心理臨床の差異と重なりに着目して--
カタリノセイセイノバトシテノシツテキケンキュウノリンショウテキイギ : リンショウシンリガクニオケルシツテキケンキュウトシンリリンショウノサイトカサナリニチャクモクシテ

Search this article

Description

This paper considers qualitative research as a field of narrative generation and examines the significance of qualitative research in clinical psychology by focusing on the narrative differences and overlap between qualitative research and psychotherapy. There are a number of differences in the basic structure of survey interviews and clinical interviews. However, a common point between the two is that in the speech act of narrating, a narrative is co-generated in the relationship between the narrator and listener. In survey interviews, narrators are asked to narrate and identify themselves according to the researchers' interest, highlighting the authority in the survey interview. However, survey interviews also involve publicity when narrators convey their experiences to the listeners, trying to find their own voice and take responsibility for the past. Researchers must always consider how to handle this paradox and narrative ethics in qualitative research, which may lead to the ethical questioning process in psychotherapy.

Journal

Kyoto University Research Studies in Education

Kyoto University Research Studies in Education 66 151-164, 2020-03-26

京都大学大学院教育学研究科

Keywords

Details 詳細情報について

Export