小冊子『大眼目』の史料批判とその射程 : 北一輝研究における史的基盤の再検討

機関リポジトリ HANDLE Web Site

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • ショウサッシ　ダイガンモク　ノ　シリョウ　ヒハン　ト　ソノ　シャテイ　キタ　イッキ　ケンキュウ　ニオケル　シテキ　キバン　ノ　サイケントウ
  • A Historical Critique of “Daiganmoku” : Review of materials relating to Kita Ikki

この論文をさがす

抄録

application/pdf

The premise of the research on Kita-Ikki（1883─1937）is that there are no historical documents that systematically describe his thought since the early 1920s. The main purpose of this article is to solve this historical problem of research on Kita by estimating the authorship of the booklet “Daiganmoku” published on December 5, 1920. The “Rodo Undo”（March 20, 1921）shows that “Daiganmoku” was written by Kita, but for some reason the signature was given as Sumida-Kiyohiko. In addition, the contents of “Daiganmoku” are explanations in simple language by the “author” about the contents of Kita’s previous books, which points out the strong relationship between Kita and “Daiganmoku”. In spite of these evidences, the author of “Daiganmoku” was presumed to be Sumida in previous studies, and “Daiganmoku” was not considered as a subject of Kita research. “Daiganmoku” has been republished three times since its original publication, the last time in 1933, when it was renamed “Pure Nationalism”. In addition, “Daiganmoku” shows how the ideas of Kita influenced the right-wing activists during the period when he was active in Yuzonsha. This article is not only significant for solving the problem of consistency of thought that has existed in the history of research on Kita, but also contributes to the progress of research on the 2.26 Incident. It can be said that this article has opened up a new horizon for the study of Kita.

収録刊行物

キーワード

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ