Resident and facility characteristics associated with care‐need level deterioration in long‐term care welfare facilities in Japan

DOI 機関リポジトリ 機関リポジトリ (HANDLE) Web Site Web Site 被引用文献7件 参考文献21件 オープンアクセス

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • Resident and facility characteristics associated with care-need level deterioration in long-term care welfare facilities in Japan

この論文をさがす

説明

<jats:sec><jats:title>Aim</jats:title><jats:p>To determine the resident and facility characteristics associated with residents’ care‐need level deterioration in long‐term care welfare facilities in Japan.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>A nationally representative sample of 358 886 residents who lived in 3774 long‐term care welfare facilities for at least 1 year from October 2012 was obtained from long‐term care insurance claims data. Facility characteristics were linked with a survey of institutions and establishments for long‐term care in 2012. We used a multilevel logistic regression according to the inclusion and exclusion of lost to follow‐up to define the resident and facility characteristics associated with resident care‐need level deteriorations (lost to follow‐up: the majority were hospitalized residents or had died; were treated as deterioration in the including loss to follow‐up model).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Adjusting for the covariates, at the resident level, older age and lower care‐need level at baseline were more likely to show deterioration in the care‐need level. At the facility level, metropolitan facilities, unit model (all private room settings) and mixed‐model facilities (partly private room settings) were less likely to experience care‐need level deterioration. A higher proportion of registered nurses among all nurses was negatively related to care‐need level deterioration only in the model including lost to follow‐up. A higher proportion of registered dietitians among all dietitians and the facilities in business for fewer years were negatively associated with care‐need level deterioration only in the model excluding lost to follow‐up.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>The present study could help identify residents who are at risk of care‐need level deterioration, and could contribute to improvements in provider quality performance and enhance competence in the market. <jats:bold>Geriatr Gerontol Int 2018; 18: 758–766</jats:bold>.</jats:p></jats:sec>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (7)*注記

もっと見る

参考文献 (21)*注記

もっと見る

関連プロジェクト

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ