身元保証の裁判例(1) : 過去20年間の裁判例の考察

機関リポジトリ Web Site

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • ミモト ホショウ ノ サイバンレイ 1 カコ 20ネンカン ノ サイバンレイ ノ コウサツ
  • Judicial Decisions on Fidelity Guarantee (1) : A Study through Judicial Decisions in the Last Twenty Years

この論文をさがす

抄録

type:Departmental Bulletin Paper

In this paper I took up and examined judicialdecisions on fidelity guarantee (Mimoto-Hosho)in the last twenty years.Fidelity guarantee is a security system in accordance with the longstanding customs of ourcountry. In many cases, a contract is made atthe start of employment. However, dependingon the situation, the fidelity guarantee contracthas to be updated every five years during theemployment period.Regardless of the presence or absence of legalresponsibility, in Japan, the term “Mimoto-Hosho” is also used in various situations other than employment. In particular, a fidelity guaranteefor an employee pursues a guarantor’s legal responsibility. Also in this guarantee, althoughthe legal responsibility of a guarantor is not always recognized, those who are requestedto become a guarantor (Mimoto-Hoshonin) are forced under a heavy psychological burden.In principle, a guarantor assumes responsibilityfor compensating the damage which an employee does to an employer. Between a guarantor and an employer, the amount of the guarantor’s obligation to pay reparations is not usually defined in advance. A guarantor may be burdened with a very heavy responsibility in some cases.The Fidelity Guarantee Act was enacted in 1933, and courts have limited the range of guarantorresponsibility by judicial discretion based on the Act. I examined how the courts would have solved the cases in this paper. In part (1), I considered judicial decisions about the legal character of fidelity guarantee and the formation of a fidelity guarantee contract.

identifier:彦根論叢, 第392号, pp. 4-19

identifier:The Hikone Ronso, No.392, pp. 4-19

収録刊行物

  • 彦根論叢

    彦根論叢 第392号 4-19, 2012-06

    滋賀大学経済学会

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ