なぜ,日本国憲法「公共の福祉」概念が,国連人権機関で問題とされるのか?

機関リポジトリ Web Site

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • Why has the United Nations Human Rights Committee questioned the concept of "public welfare" in the Japanese Constitution?
  • ナゼ,ニホンコク ケンポウ 「 コウキョウ ノ フクシ 」 ガイネン ガ,コクレン ジンケン キカン デ モンダイ ト サレル ノ カ?

この論文をさがす

抄録

Since Japan's ratification of the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights in 1979, the Japanese government has submitted six state reports explaining the human rights situation in Japan. On all occasions the United Nations Human Rights Committee questioned the concept of "public welfare" contained in the Japanese Constitution, suggesting it allowed for a general restriction on human rights in the Constitution. This article clarifies the different viewpoints between the Japanese government and the UNHR Committee as they are found through an analysis of the state reports and the dialogue held between the two parties.

Since Japan's ratification of the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights in 1979, the Japanese government has submitted six state reports explaining the human rights situation in Japan. On all occasions the United Nations Human Rights Committee questioned the concept of "public welfare" contained in the Japanese Constitution, suggesting it allowed for a general restriction on human rights in the Constitution. This article clarifies the different viewpoints between the Japanese government and the UNHR Committee as they are found through an analysis of the state reports and the dialogue held between the two parties.

収録刊行物

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ