西洋哲学はなぜ「老い」を問えなかったのか?──「『老い』のイドラ」と目的論──
書誌事項
- タイトル別名
-
- Why Has Western Philosophy Failed to Question “Aging”?: “Idola of Aging”and Teleology in Western Philosophy
抄録
In this paper, I attempt to clarify the preconceived notion of “aging” that has been cultivated in the Western philosophical tradition, and which is still prevalent in contemporary society, namely, the “Idola of ‘aging’”. Therefore, this paper will attempt to elucidate the “Idola of ‘aging’” in Western philosophy and contemporary society by exploring the question of “why Western philosophy could not question ‘aging’”. Through this clarification, the possibility of a different way of looking at “aging” will be revealed. This paper will proceed in the following order. First, I will clarify that the “Idola of ‘old age’” in the history of Western philosophy is an assumption or preconceived notion of “old age” as decline. The discourse on “aging” in the history of Western philosophy can be regarded as an acceptance of or a reaction against this “Idola of aging”. Second, I will show the sources of the “idola of aging” in Western philosophy in the connection between Aristotle's Teleology and his theory of happiness. Third, I will show the “Idola of aging” (i.e., the view of “old age” as decline) always occurs when human life is viewed from an teleological perspective. Finally, I will examine the possibility of a different way of thinking about “old age” for moving away from the “idola of ‘old age’”, through the examination of Gadamer’s de-teleological thinking about “health”.
収録刊行物
-
- 政策文化総合研究所年報
-
政策文化総合研究所年報 26 71-86, 2023-09-30
中央大学政策文化総合研究所
- Tweet
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1050298588047094144
-
- ISSN
- 13442902
-
- 本文言語コード
- ja
-
- 資料種別
- departmental bulletin paper
-
- データソース種別
-
- IRDB