The Influence of Decision-making Rules on Individual Preferences for Ecological Restoration: Evidence from an Experimental Survey

Description

Abstract We conduct an experimental survey to analyze how rules for collective decision-making influence individual preferences regarding nature restoration plans. Our study compares two decision-making rules—a consensus rule and a majority rule—wherein participants decide on a plan regarding nature restoration in the Kushiro Wetland, Japan. Our main finding is that the difference between the individual preferences and collective decision-making is less significant under the consensus rule than the majority rule. Furthermore, there is a larger disparity with regard to the marginal willingness to pay between collective and individual decisions when participants are unsatisfied with the results of collective choice.

Journal

Related Projects

See more

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top