- 【Updated on May 12, 2025】 Integration of CiNii Dissertations and CiNii Books into CiNii Research
- Trial version of CiNii Research Knowledge Graph Search feature is available on CiNii Labs
- Suspension and deletion of data provided by Nikkei BP
- Regarding the recording of “Research Data” and “Evidence Data”
Further Reasons for the “But for” Defense of a Grant-Back Clause and the Attribute of Innovation
Description
This study investigates the effect of grant-back clauses in licensing agreements using a different analytical manner from that of Ambashi, Régibeau, and Rockett (2019) (abbreviated by “ARR”). Both this study and theirs focus on attributes of innovations categorized as either “severable” (noninfringing) or “nonseverable” (infringing). The European Commission's 2004 Technology Transfer Guidelines consider a grant-back clause applied to nonseverable innovation innocuous. In contrast, those guidelines indicate that a grant-back clause that applies to severable innovation should be treated with much greater skepticism. However, this study reveals that this guidance requires further debate concerning prohibitions on territorial restraints and multiple heterogeneous licensees, as well as other factors noted in the work of ARR.
Journal
-
- KIER Discussion Paper
-
KIER Discussion Paper 1073 1-33,
京都大学経済研究所
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1050584642174012032
-
- HANDLE
- 10935/0002005973
-
- Text Lang
- en
-
- Article Type
- journal article
-
- Data Source
-
- IRDB