Ius civile in artem redigere: authority, method and argument in Roman legal science
この論文をさがす
抄録
Norm-rationality and authority-based arguments furnish sufficient grounds for legitimizing the activity of professional lawyers and for justifying their decision-propositions whenever there is a state of evaluative identification between the holders of the norm-giving power and the legal profession. This was the case with respect to Roman legal science. Its protagonists were originally members of Rome's ruling aristocratic elite. But during the imperial age the jurists relied increasingly on the power of the emperor whom they were compelled to serve. This paper comments on the development of Roman legal science understood as a move towards a normativist version of legal positivism based on an epistemology and methodology in which law is a set of rules sufficiently justified by reference to the will of the legislator - in the Imperial Age the will of the emperor.
収録刊行物
-
- 西洋古代史研究
-
西洋古代史研究 9 33-46, 2009-12-01
京都大学大学院文学研究科
- Tweet
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1050845760637255296
-
- NII論文ID
- 120002770516
-
- NII書誌ID
- AA11606759
-
- ISSN
- 13468405
-
- HANDLE
- 2433/134850
-
- NDL書誌ID
- 10524050
-
- 本文言語コード
- en
-
- 資料種別
- departmental bulletin paper
-
- データソース種別
-
- IRDB
- NDL
- CiNii Articles