書誌事項
- タイトル別名
-
- アクティブラーニング ホウシキ ニ ヨル ギョウセイホウ ケース スタディ ノ キロク : トウキョウチハンヘイセイ 27ネン 8ガツ 28ニチ コンゴ コクミン ノ ナンミン フニンテイ ショブン トウ トリケシ セイキュウ ジケン オ ソザイ ト シテ
- An Administrative Law Case Study Taught with the Active Learning Method: A Class Record
この論文をさがす
抄録
type:text
This article records educational practices that took place in our faculty. The name of the classis “Law and Administration B”. In this class, students learn the basic law systems and proceduresof administration using a certain law case concerning recognition of refugee status. The laws tobe introduced in the class are as follows; Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act,Administrative Complaint Review Act, Administrative Case Litigation Act, and State Redress Act.These laws are naturally based on the Constitution of Japan and Convention Relating to the Statusof Refugees. For the last two years, I, teacher of the class, selected the following case; the plaintiffwas a national of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, a teacher of a junior high school, a memberof a political organization, and a father. In the Congo, he was wanted by the police and army becauseof his participation in several political movements, and applied for refugee status in Japan. TheMinister of Justice, who holds the authority of refugee status recognition, denied him refugee status,and refused to grant him special permission to stay in Japan. The plaintiff filed an objection with theMinister of Justice according to the Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act (this procedurefor filing objections was later incorporated into the Administrative Complaint Review Act procedureby the law amendment in 2016). His objection was dismissed and he was likely to be forced torepatriate. Then he made a lawsuit seeking the revocation of several dispositions: the denial ofrecognition of refugee status, the disposition not to grant special permission to stay, the issue ofa written deportation order, and so on. He also sought the order of the court (a sort of mandamus)against the Minister of Justice to make a new refugee status recognition for him according to theAdministrative Case Litigation Act. In addition to those requests, he appealed for damages to theState, claiming immigration inspectors unlawfully inflicted damage on him by negligence accordingto the State Redress Act. In this spring semester, I adopted the active learning method instead of thesimple lecture style or the Socratic method. As described above, this case includes diverse claimsand the issues vary accordingly. Students tackled these difficult and complicated issues with deepempathy for the plaintiff, showing remarkable growth. This article records this experience.
収録刊行物
-
- 文教大学国際学部紀要 = Journal of the Faculty of International Studies Bunkyo University
-
文教大学国際学部紀要 = Journal of the Faculty of International Studies Bunkyo University 28 (2), 127-142, 2018-01-31
文教大学
- Tweet
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1050845762959221760
-
- NII論文ID
- 120006462745
-
- NII書誌ID
- AN10363700
-
- ISSN
- 09173072
-
- NDL書誌ID
- 028815281
-
- 本文言語コード
- ja
-
- 資料種別
- departmental bulletin paper
-
- データソース種別
-
- IRDB
- NDL
- CiNii Articles