異なる測定方法による体脂肪率推定値の比較 : 健康関連体力測定項目としての観点から

機関リポジトリ Web Site

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • コトナル ソクテイ ホウホウ ニヨル タイシボウリツ スイテイチ ノ ヒカク
  • コトナル ソクテイ ホウホウ ニ ヨル タイシボウリツ スイテイチ ノ ヒカク : ケンコウ カンレン タイリョク ソクテイ コウモク ト シテ ノ カンテン カラ
  • Kotonaru sokutei hoho ni yoru taishiboritsu suiteichi no hikaku : kenko kanren tairyoku sokutei komoku to shite no kanten kara
  • Comparison between different methods for body composition assessment

この論文をさがす

抄録

type:text

The purpose of this report was to investigate the measuring techniques for "body composition (estimated % fat)" as an item of Health-related physical fitness test(HRPF test) for students and staffs in Keio university. In this report, Bioelectorical Impedance analysis (BI method) and ultrasound method were compared as the measuring techniques. Particularly, we had to confirm the BI method which we adopt for our HRPF test. Subjects were male students, female students, male athletes and female adults who were not students, and we measured their %fat. A significant correlation was observed in estimated % fat derived from BI and ultrasound method. It meant that BI method had a certain reliability for %fat estimation. However, there were some differences between estimated values from BI and ultrasound methods depending on the subjects. Therefore, we have to recognize the fact that there might be some errors to measure and evaluate the values considerably. We primarily need a simplified procedure to obtain the value in order to measure a lot of subjects in a limited period, and also reliability of the method. From the result of this study, BI method was considered to be effective for the HRPF test in our university.

収録刊行物

キーワード

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ