A methodological examination of the economic effect of sports policy and project : utilizing regional value-added analysis and input–output analysis

IR Web Site Open Access

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • スポーツ関連政策・事業における経済的な効果の分析方法の検討 : 地域付加価値創造分析と産業連関分析の活用について
  • スポーツ カンレン セイサク ・ ジギョウ ニ オケル ケイザイテキ ナ コウカ ノ ブンセキ ホウホウ ノ ケントウ : チイキ フカ カチ ソウゾウ ブンセキ ト サンギョウ レンカン ブンセキ ノ カツヨウ ニ ツイテ

Search this article

Description

Yokota et al. (2020) investigated the economic impact of sports facilities by applying regional value-added analysis to their establishment and operation. Regional value-added analysis is used mainly in Germany as an analytical method to assess the degree to which renewable energy development will affect the country’s economy. However, analyzing economic effects often entails input–output analysis. The purpose of this study is to conduct a regional value-added analysis and input–output analysis on given projects to compare the results as well as identify the characteristics of the two analyses. We conducted two types of analysis on 13 projects involving the establishment and operation of high-altitude training sites in Tomi City, Nagano Prefecture. In the regional value-added analysis, value-added totaled 443 million yen (Yokota, 2020); and in the input–output analysis, net value-added was 697 million yen; gross value-added was 959 million yen; and total output was 1,529 million yen. Broken down by project, all analytical findings revealed a similar pattern. Both analyses are useful for analyzing the economic contribution to a region. Regional value-added analysis is more suited to project-level examination, as it directly measures the new economic value-added that a project generates. Input–output analysis is considered suitable for industry or policy-level examination, as it includes the consumption effect and the induced production value resulting from ripple effects within a region. Regional value-added analysis and input–output analysis take different approaches and target different parts of the value chain; moreover, the levels of the economic value-added that they generate differ as well. It should be possible to select and implement those projects that are beneficial to a regional economy by employing the analytical methodology that aligns to the purpose for which it is being used, while incorporating the characteristics of each analysis in applying the findings. In addition, as we were able to perform a quantitative comparison of analytical findings, it may be possible to collect data on projects of various sizes and types and use the findings from one of these analyses to extrapolate the results of the other.

Journal

Keywords

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top