実験および数値計算による粘着性ひさし状河岸の浸食・崩落に関する研究

Riverbank failure results in extensive sediment production in an alluvial channel, and it can cause severe environmental and economic problems such as loss of fertilization in agriculture areas and destruction of infrastructure. However, because a cantilever failure involves a rapid channel widening and delivers a large volume of sediment into a channel, such a failure is a serious issue in a river engineering. Difference types of riverbank failures have been investigated in the previous studies, but these works have limitations in understanding the complex mechanisms of cantilever failure regarding the coupling of fluvial erosion with that failure. Elucidating the underlying mechanism of a cantilever failure by means of experimental works and numerical studies are therefore the challenging tasks for complete understanding of fluvial erosion, cantilever failure, slump block effect, and bedload sedimentation along an alluvial channel. Firstly, the simple bank failure model was employed to simulate bank failure and bed deformation, using a two dimensional depth-averaged model and an equilibrium sediment transport model, for homogeneous and heterogeneous grain size conditions. Moreover, the numerical conditions were similar with those used in the previous experimental works. The numerical models under homogeneous and heterogeneous conditions can reproduce the experimental results using an appropriate angle of repose and a suitable transversal grid size. For homogeneous condition, the temporal changes in an averaged cross-sectional profile over longitudinal direction were in a relatively good agreement with the experimental results. However, the numerical results of the bed deformation were not satisfactory in heterogeneous condition. The main reason is that the armoring effect is developed to reinforce the top layer of bank-toe in the experimental results but the simple bank failure model is limited in its ability to simulate the armoring effect.Next, the cantilever failure mechanisms were investigated by means of small-scale experiments and numerical modeling. In laboratory experiments, three types of cohesive materials with different percentages of silt-clay content were carried out in seven cases by varying the hydraulic conditions. The small-scale experiments showed that fluvial erosion of the submerged zone progressively undermines the riverbank during the initial stage of a cantilever failure. Tension cracks then develop at the upper surface of the cohesive banks and beam-type failure occurs thereafter. Moreover, the numerical modeling of a cantilever failure implemented by a triple-grid approach within the framework of fluvial erosion and the cantilever’s subsequent failure were validated by the small-scale experimental results. The simulated results showed good agreement with the small-scale experimental results in terms of spatial-averaged bank width and water level along cohesive banks. Additionally, the small-scale experimental results were compared to both the failure mechanisms of the cantilever failure model and simple bank failure model. The comparisons showed that the simple bank failure model cannot reproduce the complex mechanism of cantilever failure regarding the limitation of the coupling failure mechanisms. After that, the previous empirical and analytical equations of the actual shear stress, critical shear stress, erodibility coefficient, and factor of safety of shear-type and beam-type failures were employed to validate the temporal variations of spatially averaged bank width, overhanging block dimensions, and dominant cantilever failure type with the existing small-scale experimental works and the U-Tapao River, Thailand. For fluvial erosion, the actual shear stresses of the small-scale experimental works range from 0.68 to 1.23 Pa, whereas those of the U-Tapao River are within the range of 18.51 to 22.52 Pa. Moreover, the critical shear stresses estimated by the percentage of silt-clay content of the small-scale experimental banks are within the range of 0.38 to 0.57 Pa, whereas those of the U-Tapao River range from 9.44 to 12.99 Pa. Additionally, a comparison results of the erodibility coefficient between the previous relationships with the small-scale experimental results and U-Tapao River showed a poor agreement. Therefore, the relationship between the erodibility coefficient and critical shear stress are needed to be measured locally. For overhanging block stability, the results showed that the dominant cantilever failure mechanisms of the experiment and the U-Tapao River are the beam-type and shear-type failure, respectively. Furthermore, the comparison results of the temporal variations of spatially averaged bank width between the numerical and small-scale experimental results illustrated a high degree of confidence. Significant errors occurred after the cantilever failure stage because the failure material was dropped into the channel and protected against further fluvial eros ...