Mans mortallitie, Or, A treatise wherein 'tis proved, both theologically and philosophically, that whole man (as a rationall creature) is a compound wholy mortall, contrary to the common distinction of soule and body : and that the present going of the soule into Heaven or Hell is a meer fiction : and that at the resurrection is the beginning of our immortallity, and then actuall condemnation, and salvation, and not before. With all doubtes and objections answered, and resolved, both by scripture and reason; discovering the multitude of blasphemies, and absurdities that arise from the fancie of the soule. Also divers other mysteries, as, of Heavean, Hell, Christs humane residence, the extent of the resurrection, the new creation &c. opened, and presented to the tryall of better judgments

CiNii 所蔵館 1館

書誌事項

タイトル: "Mans mortallitie, Or, A treatise wherein 'tis proved, both theologically and philosophically, that whole man (as a rationall creature) is a compound wholy mortall, contrary to the common distinction of soule and body : and that the present going of the soule into Heaven or Hell is a meer fiction : and that at the resurrection is the beginning of our immortallity, and then actuall condemnation, and salvation, and not before. With all doubtes and objections answered, and resolved, both by scripture and reason; discovering the multitude of blasphemies, and absurdities that arise from the fancie of the soule. Also divers other mysteries, as, of Heavean, Hell, Christs humane residence, the extent of the resurrection, the new creation &c. opened, and presented to the tryall of better judgments"

出版者

タイトル別名

Treatise wherein 'tis proved, both theologically and philosophically, that whole man (as a rationall creature) is a compound wholy mortall

Reprint. Originally published: Amsterdam [i.e. London] : Printed by John Canne, Anno. Dom. 1643

R.O. = Richard Overton

Text is continuous despite pagination

Annotation on Thomason copy: "Jan: 19"; Amsterdam in the imprint crossed out and altered to "London"

Page number 56 misnumbered 57

Reproduction of the original in the British Library

References: Wing (2nd ed.) O629D

References: Thomason E.29[16]