Expenditure Inequality in <scp>I</scp>ndonesia, 2008–2010: A Spatial Decomposition Analysis and the Role of Education

  • Mitsuhiro Hayashi
    Faculty of Economics Chuo University 742‐1 Higashi Nakano, Hachioji‐shi Tokyo 192‐0393 Japan
  • Mitsuhiko Kataoka
    Department of Economics Chiba Keizai University 3‐59‐5 Todoroki‐cho, Inage‐ku Chiba 263‐0021 Japan
  • Takahiro Akita
    College of Business Rikkyo University 3‐34‐1 Nishi‐Ikebukuro, Toshima‐ku Tokyo 171‐8501 Japan

Description

<jats:p>Based on the 2008–2010 <jats:italic><jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">S</jats:styled-content>usenas</jats:italic> panel data, this study examines expenditure inequality from spatial perspectives in <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">I</jats:styled-content>ndonesia, using three decomposition methods: (i) a conventional Theil index decomposition; (ii) an alternative <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">T</jats:styled-content>heil index decomposition proposed by <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">E</jats:styled-content>lbers <jats:italic>et al</jats:italic>. (2008); and (iii) the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">B</jats:styled-content>linder−<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">O</jats:styled-content>axaca decomposition. Our results show that overall inequality in per capita expenditure increases between 2008 and 2010, which coincides with a rising trend in the official <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">G</jats:styled-content>ini coefficient. The contribution of inequality within urban and rural areas to total inequality is larger than that of inequality between urban and rural areas. Looking within urban and rural areas, urban inequality is significantly higher than rural inequality. <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">J</jats:styled-content>ava‐<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">B</jats:styled-content>ali in particular records very high urban inequality. Overall, urban inequality increases, urban–rural inequality remains stable, rural inequality decreases, and inequality at the national level increases. Although urban–rural inequality has a relatively low share in overall inequality, the share is not small enough to ignore its impact. Furthermore, when using the alternative decomposition method, the contribution of urban–rural inequality increases substantially. The present study also found that educational differences appear to have played an important role in expenditure inequality within urban areas and between urban and rural areas.</jats:p>

Journal

Citations (4)*help

See more

References(36)*help

See more

Related Projects

See more

Report a problem

Back to top