Clinical outcomes of direct‐acting antiviral treatments for patients with hepatitis C after hepatocellular carcinoma are equivalent to interferon treatment

  • Yuki Tahata
    Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Suita Osaka Japan
  • Ryotaro Sakamori
    Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Suita Osaka Japan
  • Ayako Urabe
    Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Suita Osaka Japan
  • Ryoko Yamada
    Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Suita Osaka Japan
  • Kazuyoshi Ohkawa
    Osaka International Cancer Institute Osaka Osaka Japan
  • Naoki Hiramatsu
    Osaka Rosai Hospital Sakai Osaka Japan
  • Hideki Hagiwara
    Kansai Rosai Hospital Amagasaki Hyogo Japan
  • Masahide Oshita
    Osaka Police Hospital Osaka Osaka Japan
  • Yasuharu Imai
    Ikeda Municipal Hospital, Ikeda Osaka Japan
  • Takahiro Kodama
    Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Suita Osaka Japan
  • Hayato Hikita
    Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Suita Osaka Japan
  • Tomohide Tatsumi
    Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Suita Osaka Japan
  • Tetsuo Takehara
    Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Suita Osaka Japan

この論文をさがす

抄録

<jats:sec><jats:title>Aim</jats:title><jats:p>It remains unclear how direct‐acting antiviral (DAA) treatments influence hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence and survival in comparison with interferon (IFN).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>In total, 338 patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and previous HCC treatments who initiated IFN (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 88, IFN group) or DAA treatment (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 250, DAA group) from January 2005 to November 2017 at 23 hospitals and achieved sustained virologic response (SVR) were analyzed. Cumulative HCC recurrence and survival rates were compared between the two groups using propensity score (PS) matching.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>After PS matching, 63 patients were selected for each group. The cumulative HCC recurrence rates at 1 and 3 years were 20.6% and 34.6% in the IFN group and 19.2% and 43.0% in the DAA group, respectively; the difference in cumulative HCC recurrence rates between the two groups was not significant (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.332). No significant differences in HCC recurrence patterns were observed between the two groups. Overall survival rates at 1 and 3 years were 100% and 96.6% in the IFN group and 100% and 96.4% in the DAA group, respectively; the difference in overall survival rates between the two groups was not significant (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.132). No significant differences in HCC recurrence and overall survival rates were observed between the two groups in subgroup analyses of patients receiving curative treatment (liver resection or radiofrequency ablation) for the most recent HCC before HCV treatment.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>The recurrence rates and patterns of HCC and overall survival rates do not differ between SVR patients receiving IFN and DAA treatments.</jats:p></jats:sec>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (5)*注記

もっと見る

参考文献 (32)*注記

もっと見る

関連プロジェクト

もっと見る

問題の指摘

ページトップへ