Scavenging in the Anthropocene: Human impact drives vertebrate scavenger species richness at a global scale

  • Esther Sebastián‐González
    Departamento de Biología Aplicada Universidad Miguel Hernández Elche Spain
  • Jomar Magalhães Barbosa
    Departamento de Biología Aplicada Universidad Miguel Hernández Elche Spain
  • Juan M. Pérez‐García
    Departamento de Biología Aplicada Universidad Miguel Hernández Elche Spain
  • Zebensui Morales‐Reyes
    Departamento de Biología Aplicada Universidad Miguel Hernández Elche Spain
  • Francisco Botella
    Departamento de Biología Aplicada Universidad Miguel Hernández Elche Spain
  • Pedro P. Olea
    Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global (CIBC‐UAM) Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Madrid Spain
  • Patricia Mateo‐Tomás
    Centre for Functional Ecology, Department of Life Sciences University of Coimbra Coimbra Portugal
  • Marcos Moleón
    Department of Zoology University of Granada Granada Spain
  • Fernando Hiraldo
    Department of Conservation Biology Doñana Biological Station‐CSIC Seville Spain
  • Eneko Arrondo
    Department of Conservation Biology Doñana Biological Station‐CSIC Seville Spain
  • José A. Donázar
    Department of Conservation Biology Doñana Biological Station‐CSIC Seville Spain
  • Ainara Cortés‐Avizanda
    Department of Conservation Biology Doñana Biological Station‐CSIC Seville Spain
  • Nuria Selva
    Institute of Nature Conservation Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland
  • Sergio A. Lambertucci
    Grupo de Investigaciones en Bilogía de la Conservación, Laboratorio Ecotono INIBIOMA (CONICET, Universidad Nacional del Comahue) Bariloche Argentina
  • Aishwarya Bhattacharjee
    Department of Biology, Queens College City University of New York Queens New York
  • Alexis Brewer
    Department of Biology, Queens College City University of New York Queens New York
  • José D. Anadón
    Department of Biology, Queens College City University of New York Queens New York
  • Erin Abernethy
    Integrative Biology Department Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon
  • Olin E. Rhodes
    Savannah River Ecology Lab, Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources University of Georgia Aiken South Carolina
  • Kelsey Turner
    Savannah River Ecology Lab, Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources University of Georgia Aiken South Carolina
  • James C. Beasley
    Savannah River Ecology Lab, Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources University of Georgia Aiken South Carolina
  • Travis L. DeVault
    National Wildlife Research Center United States Department of Agriculture Sandusky Ohio
  • Andrés Ordiz
    Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management Norwegian University of Life Sciences Ås Norway
  • Camilla Wikenros
    Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Department of Ecology Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Riddarhyttan Sweden
  • Barbara Zimmermann
    Faculty of Applied Ecology, Agricultural Sciences and Biotechnology Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences Elverum Norway
  • Petter Wabakken
    Faculty of Applied Ecology, Agricultural Sciences and Biotechnology Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences Elverum Norway
  • Christopher C. Wilmers
    Center for Integrated Spatial Research, Environmental Studies Department University of California Santa Cruz California
  • Justine A. Smith
    Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management University of California Berkeley California
  • Corinne J. Kendall
    North Carolina Zoo Asheboro North Carolina
  • Darcy Ogada
    Ornithology Section National Museums of Kenya Nairobi Kenya
  • Evan R. Buechley
    Department of Biology University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah
  • Ethan Frehner
    Department of Biology University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah
  • Maximilian L. Allen
    Illinois Natural History Survey, University of Illinois Champaign Illinois
  • Heiko U. Wittmer
    School of Biological Sciences Victoria University of Wellington Wellington New Zealand
  • James R. A. Butler
    CSIRO Land and Water Brisbane Qld Australia
  • Johan T. du Toit
    Department of Wildland Resources Utah State University Logan Utah
  • John Read
    Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences University of Adelaide Adelaide SA Australia
  • David Wilson
    The Biodiversity Consultancy Cambridge UK
  • Klemen Jerina
    Biotechnical Faculty University of Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia
  • Miha Krofel
    Biotechnical Faculty University of Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia
  • Rich Kostecke
    The Nature Conservancy Austin Texas
  • Richard Inger
    Environment and Sustainability Institute University of Exeter Penryn UK
  • Arockianathan Samson
    Department of Zoology and Wildlife Biology Government Arts College The Nilgiris India
  • Lara Naves‐Alegre
    Departamento de Biología Aplicada Universidad Miguel Hernández Elche Spain
  • José A. Sánchez‐Zapata
    Departamento de Biología Aplicada Universidad Miguel Hernández Elche Spain

書誌事項

公開日
2019-06-24
権利情報
  • http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#am
  • http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
DOI
  • 10.1111/gcb.14708
公開者
Wiley

この論文をさがす

説明

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Understanding the distribution of biodiversity across the Earth is one of the most challenging questions in biology. Much research has been directed at explaining the species latitudinal pattern showing that communities are richer in tropical areas; however, despite decades of research, a general consensus has not yet emerged. In addition, global biodiversity patterns are being rapidly altered by human activities. Here, we aim to describe large‐scale patterns of species richness and diversity in terrestrial vertebrate scavenger (carrion‐consuming) assemblages, which provide key ecosystem functions and services. We used a worldwide dataset comprising 43 sites, where vertebrate scavenger assemblages were identified using 2,485 carcasses monitored between 1991 and 2018. First, we evaluated how scavenger richness (number of species) and diversity (Shannon diversity index) varied among seasons (cold vs. warm, wet vs. dry). Then, we studied the potential effects of human impact and a set of macroecological variables related to climatic conditions on the scavenger assemblages. Vertebrate scavenger richness ranged from species‐poor to species rich assemblages (4–30 species). Both scavenger richness and diversity also showed some seasonal variation. However, in general, climatic variables did not drive latitudinal patterns, as scavenger richness and diversity were not affected by temperature or rainfall. Rainfall seasonality slightly increased the number of species in the community, but its effect was weak. Instead, the human impact index included in our study was the main predictor of scavenger richness. Scavenger assemblages in highly human‐impacted areas sustained the smallest number of scavenger species, suggesting human activity may be overriding other macroecological processes in shaping scavenger communities. Our results highlight the effect of human impact at a global scale. As species‐rich assemblages tend to be more functional, we warn about possible reductions in ecosystem functions and the services provided by scavengers in human‐dominated landscapes in the Anthropocene.</jats:p>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (2)*注記

もっと見る

問題の指摘

ページトップへ