Primary Premaxillary Setback and Repair of Bilateral Complete Cleft Lip: Indications, Technique, and Outcomes
-
- Raj M. Vyas
- School of Medicine, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, California.
-
- David C. Kim
- Los Angeles, California.
-
- Bonnie L. Padwa
- Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
-
- John B. Mulliken
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
この論文をさがす
説明
<jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p> To analyze indications and outcomes for primary premaxillary setback. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design</jats:title><jats:p> Retrospective. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Setting</jats:title><jats:p> Academic children's hospital. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Patients</jats:title><jats:p> All children with bilateral complete cleft lip age ≤2 years of age who had premaxillary setback by one surgeon (1992 to 2011). </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p> Twenty-five patients with bilateral complete cleft lip underwent primary premaxillary setback at an average age of 9 months; the mean follow-up was 47 months. There were three indications: failed dentofacial orthopedics (n = 9), delayed referral precluding manipulation (n = 10), and intact secondary alate (n = 6). Of 19 patients with bilateral complete cleft lip/palate, primary setback was combined with nasolabial repair (n = 11), adhesions (n = 2), or palatoplasty (n = 6). Patients who had nasolabial closure and setback were significantly younger than those who had combined palatal closure and setback (6.5 versus 16 months, P = .01). No patient exhibited postoperative premaxillary instability. Serial anthropometry showed similar growth of nasolabial features after both primary setback (n = 9) and active dentofacial orthopedics (n = 35). </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p> Primary premaxillary ostectomy and setback permits synchronous bilateral nasolabial-alveolar closure or alveolar-palatal repair in a child with intact secondary palate. This procedure should be considered whenever dentofacial orthopedics cannot be accomplished. Speech is paramount in an older child; setback with palatal closure is scheduled before nasolabial repair. Disturbance of midfacial growth is likely following primary premaxillary ostectomy and setback in patients with bilateral complete cleft lip/palate; however, most already need maxillary advancement. Furthermore, premaxillary setback permits proper primary nasolabial design and construction in appreciation of expected changes with growth. </jats:p></jats:sec>
収録刊行物
-
- The Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal
-
The Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal 53 (3), 302-308, 2016-05
SAGE Publications
- Tweet
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1360011145206975360
-
- DOI
- 10.1597/14-099
-
- ISSN
- 15451569
- 10556656
-
- データソース種別
-
- Crossref