Impact of pyrethroid resistance on operational malaria control in Malawi

  • Charles S. Wondji
    Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool L3 5QA, United Kingdom;
  • Michael Coleman
    Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool L3 5QA, United Kingdom;
  • Immo Kleinschmidt
    London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom; and
  • Themba Mzilahowa
    Malaria Alert Centre, College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi
  • Helen Irving
    Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool L3 5QA, United Kingdom;
  • Miranda Ndula
    Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool L3 5QA, United Kingdom;
  • Andrea Rehman
    London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom; and
  • John Morgan
    Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool L3 5QA, United Kingdom;
  • Kayla G. Barnes
    Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool L3 5QA, United Kingdom;
  • Janet Hemingway
    Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool L3 5QA, United Kingdom;

Description

<jats:p> The impact of insecticide resistance on insect-borne disease programs is difficult to quantify. The possibility of eliminating malaria in high-transmission settings is heavily dependent on effective vector control reducing disease transmission rates. Pyrethroids are the dominant insecticides used for malaria control, with few options for their replacement. Their failure will adversely affect our ability to control malaria. Pyrethroid resistance has been selected in Malawi over the last 3 y in the two major malaria vectors <jats:italic>Anopheles gambiae</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>Anopheles funestus</jats:italic> , with a higher frequency of resistance in the latter. The resistance in <jats:italic>An. funestus</jats:italic> is metabolically based and involves the up-regulation of two duplicated P450s. The same genes confer resistance in Mozambican <jats:italic>An. funestus</jats:italic> , although the levels of up-regulation differ. The selection of resistance over 3 y has not increased malaria transmission, as judged by annual point prevalence surveys in 1- to 4-y-old children. This is true in areas with long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) alone or LLINs plus pyrethroid-based insecticide residual spraying (IRS). However, in districts where IRS was scaled up, it did not produce the expected decrease in malaria prevalence. As resistance increases in frequency from this low initial level, there is the potential for vector population numbers to increase with a concomitant negative impact on control efficacy. This should be monitored carefully as part of the operational activities in country. </jats:p>

Journal

Citations (1)*help

See more

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top