ECOSTRESS: NASA's Next Generation Mission to Measure Evapotranspiration From the International Space Station

  • Joshua B. Fisher
    Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA
  • Brian Lee
    Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA
  • Adam J. Purdy
    Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA
  • Gregory H. Halverson
    Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA
  • Matthew B. Dohlen
    Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA
  • Kerry Cawse‐Nicholson
    Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA
  • Audrey Wang
    Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA
  • Ray G. Anderson
    U.S. Department of Agriculture Riverside CA USA
  • Bruno Aragon
    Hydrology, Agriculture and Land Observation Group (HALO), Division of Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Thuwal Saudi Arabia
  • M. Altaf Arain
    School of Geography and Earth Sciences McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada
  • Dennis D. Baldocchi
    Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management University of California Berkeley CA USA
  • John M. Baker
    U.S. Department of Agriculture St. Paul MN USA
  • Hélène Barral
    HydroSciences Montpellier (HSM), University Montpellier, CNRS, IRD Montpellier France
  • Carl J. Bernacchi
    Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation, Institute for Sustainability, Energy, and Environment and Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology University of Illinois Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA
  • Christian Bernhofer
    Technische Universität Dresden Institute of Hydrology and Meteorology Tharandt Germany
  • Sébastien C. Biraud
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley CA USA
  • Gil Bohrer
    Department of Civil, Environmental and Geodetic Engineering Ohio State University Columbus OH USA
  • Nathaniel Brunsell
    Department of Geography and Atmospheric Science University of Kansas Lawrence KS USA
  • Bernard Cappelaere
    HydroSciences Montpellier (HSM), University Montpellier, CNRS, IRD Montpellier France
  • Saulo Castro‐Contreras
    Centre for Earth Observation Sciences (CEOS), Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Department University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada
  • Junghwa Chun
    National Institute of Forest Science Seoul South Korea
  • Bryan J. Conrad
    Department of Geography and Atmospheric Science University of Kansas Lawrence KS USA
  • Edoardo Cremonese
    Environmental Protection Agency of Aosta Valley Aosta Italy
  • Jérôme Demarty
    HydroSciences Montpellier (HSM), University Montpellier, CNRS, IRD Montpellier France
  • Ankur R. Desai
    Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences University of Wisconsin‐Madison Madison WI USA
  • Anne De Ligne
    TERRA Teaching and Research Centre, Gembloux Agro‐Bio Tech University of Liege Gembloux Belgium
  • Lenka Foltýnová
    Global Change Research Institute Czech Academy of Sciences Brno Czech Republic
  • Michael L. Goulden
    Department of Earth System Science University of California Irvine CA USA
  • Timothy J. Griffis
    Department of Soil, Water, and Climate University of Minnesota, Twin Cities St. Paul MN USA
  • Thomas Grünwald
    Technische Universität Dresden Institute of Hydrology and Meteorology Tharandt Germany
  • Mark S. Johnson
    Department of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada
  • Minseok Kang
    National Center for AgroMeteorology Seoul South Korea
  • Dave Kelbe
    Xerra Earth Observation Institute Alexandra New Zealand
  • Natalia Kowalska
    Global Change Research Institute Czech Academy of Sciences Brno Czech Republic
  • Jong‐Hwan Lim
    National Institute of Forest Science Seoul South Korea
  • Ibrahim Maïnassara
    HydroSciences Montpellier (HSM), University Montpellier, CNRS, IRD Montpellier France
  • Matthew F. McCabe
    Hydrology, Agriculture and Land Observation Group (HALO), Division of Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Thuwal Saudi Arabia
  • Justine E.C. Missik
    Laboratory for Atmospheric Research, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Washington State University Pullman WA USA
  • Binayak P. Mohanty
    Texas Water Observatory Texas A&M University College Station TX USA
  • Caitlin E. Moore
    Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation, Institute for Sustainability, Energy, and Environment and Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology University of Illinois Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA
  • Laura Morillas
    Department of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada
  • Ross Morrison
    Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Wallingford UK
  • J. William Munger
    School of Engineering and Applied Sciences Harvard University Cambridge MA USA
  • Gabriela Posse
    Instituto de Clima y Agua. INTA Buenos Aires Argentina
  • Andrew D. Richardson
    Center for Ecosystem Science and Society Northern Arizona University Flagstaff AZ USA
  • Eric S. Russell
    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Washington State University Pullman WA USA
  • Youngryel Ryu
    Department of Landscape Architecture and Rural Systems Engineering Seoul National University Seoul South Korea
  • Arturo Sanchez‐Azofeifa
    Centre for Earth Observation Sciences (CEOS), Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Department University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada
  • Marius Schmidt
    Institute of Bio‐ and Geosciences: Agrosphere (IBG‐3) Forschungszentrum Jülich IBG‐3 Jülich Germany
  • Efrat Schwartz
    Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Weizmann Institute of Science Rehovot Israel
  • Iain Sharp
    Centre for Earth Observation Sciences (CEOS), Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Department University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada
  • Ladislav Šigut
    Global Change Research Institute Czech Academy of Sciences Brno Czech Republic
  • Yao Tang
    School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta GA USA
  • Glynn Hulley
    Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA
  • Martha Anderson
    U.S. Department of Agriculture‐Agricultural Research Service Beltsville MD USA
  • Christopher Hain
    NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville AL USA
  • Andrew French
    U.S. Department of Agriculture Maricopa AZ USA
  • Eric Wood
    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Princeton University Princeton NJ USA
  • Simon Hook
    Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA

書誌事項

公開日
2020-04
権利情報
  • http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
  • http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
DOI
  • 10.1029/2019wr026058
公開者
American Geophysical Union (AGU)

この論文をさがす

説明

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The ECOsystem Spaceborne Thermal Radiometer Experiment on Space Station (ECOSTRESS) was launched to the International Space Station on 29 June 2018 by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The primary science focus of ECOSTRESS is centered on evapotranspiration (ET), which is produced as Level‐3 (L3) latent heat flux (<jats:italic>LE</jats:italic>) data products. These data are generated from the Level‐2 land surface temperature and emissivity product (L2_LSTE), in conjunction with ancillary surface and atmospheric data. Here, we provide the first validation (Stage 1, preliminary) of the global ECOSTRESS clear‐sky ET product (L3_ET_PT‐JPL, Version 6.0) against <jats:italic>LE</jats:italic> measurements at 82 eddy covariance sites around the world. Overall, the ECOSTRESS ET product performs well against the site measurements (clear‐sky instantaneous/time of overpass: <jats:italic>r</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0.88; overall bias = 8%; normalized root‐mean‐square error, RMSE = 6%). ET uncertainty was generally consistent across climate zones, biome types, and times of day (ECOSTRESS samples the diurnal cycle), though temperate sites are overrepresented. The 70‐m‐high spatial resolution of ECOSTRESS improved correlations by 85%, and RMSE by 62%, relative to 1‐km pixels. This paper serves as a reference for the ECOSTRESS L3 ET accuracy and Stage 1 validation status for subsequent science that follows using these data.</jats:p>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (7)*注記

もっと見る

問題の指摘

ページトップへ