Genomic and microenvironmental landscape of stage I follicular lymphoma, compared with stage III/IV

  • G. Tjitske Los-de Vries
    1Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
  • Wendy B. C. Stevens
    2Department of Hematology, Radboudumc Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
  • Erik van Dijk
    1Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
  • Carole Langois-Jacques
    3Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Unité Mixte de recherche (UMR) 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Évolutive, Équipe Biostatistique-Santé, Villeurbanne, France;
  • Andrew J. Clear
    5Centre for Haemato-Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary, University of London, London, United Kingdom;
  • Phylicia Stathi
    1Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
  • Margaretha G. M. Roemer
    1Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
  • Matias Mendeville
    1Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
  • Nathalie J. Hijmering
    1Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
  • Birgitta Sander
    6Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Pathology, Karolinska Institute and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden;
  • Andreas Rosenwald
    7Institute of Pathology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Germany;
  • Maria Calaminici
    5Centre for Haemato-Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary, University of London, London, United Kingdom;
  • Eva Hoster
    8Department of Medicine III, University Hospital Grosshadern, Munich, Germany;
  • Wolfgang Hiddemann
    8Department of Medicine III, University Hospital Grosshadern, Munich, Germany;
  • Philippe Gaulard
    10Department of Pathology, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Assistance Pyblique- Hospitaux de Paris (APHP), INSERM U955, Université Paris-Est, Créteil, France;
  • Gilles Salles
    11Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY;
  • Heike Horn
    12Institute for Clinical Pathology, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institut für Klinische Pharmakologie, Stuttgart, Germany;
  • Wolfram Klapper
    13Institute of Pathology, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany;
  • Luc Xerri
    14Département de Biopathologie, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France;
  • Catherine Burton
    15Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, St. James University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom;
  • Reuben M. Tooze
    16Division of Haematology & Immunology, Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom;
  • Alexandra G. Smith
    17Epidemiology & Cancer Statistics Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom;
  • Christian Buske
    18Institute of Experimental Cancer Research, Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC) Ulm, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany;
  • David W. Scott
    19BC Cancer Centre for Lymphoid Cancer and The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada;
  • Yasodha Natkunam
    20Department of Pathology, and
  • Ranjana Advani
    21Department of Hematology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA;
  • Laurie H. Sehn
    19BC Cancer Centre for Lymphoid Cancer and The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada;
  • John Raemaekers
    2Department of Hematology, Radboudumc Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
  • John Gribben
    5Centre for Haemato-Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary, University of London, London, United Kingdom;
  • Eva Kimby
    22Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; and
  • Marie José Kersten
    23Department of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Delphine Maucort-Boulch
    3Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Unité Mixte de recherche (UMR) 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Évolutive, Équipe Biostatistique-Santé, Villeurbanne, France;
  • Bauke Ylstra
    1Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
  • Daphne de Jong
    1Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;

抄録

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Although the genomic and immune microenvironmental landscape of follicular lymphoma (FL) has been extensively investigated, little is known about the potential biological differences between stage I and stage III/IV disease. Using next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry, 82 FL nodal stage I cases were analyzed and compared with 139 FL stage III/IV nodal cases. Many similarities in mutations, chromosomal copy number aberrations, and microenvironmental cell populations were detected. However, there were also significant differences in microenvironmental and genomic features. CD8+ T cells (P = .02) and STAT6 mutations (false discovery rate [FDR] &lt;0.001) were more frequent in stage I FL. In contrast, programmed cell death protein 1–positive T cells, CD68+/CD163+ macrophages (P &lt; .001), BCL2 translocation (BCL2trl+) (P &lt; .0001), and KMT2D (FDR = 0.003) and CREBBP (FDR = 0.04) mutations were found more frequently in stage III/IV FL. Using clustering, we identified 3 clusters within stage I, and 2 clusters within stage III/IV. The BLC2trl+ stage I cluster was comparable to the BCL2trl+ cluster in stage III/IV. The two BCL2trl– stage I clusters were unique for stage I. One was enriched for CREBBP (95%) and STAT6 (64%) mutations, without BLC6 translocation (BCL6trl), whereas the BCL2trl– stage III/IV cluster contained BCL6trl (64%) with fewer CREBBP (45%) and STAT6 (9%) mutations. The other BCL2trl– stage I cluster was relatively heterogeneous with more copy number aberrations and linker histone mutations. This exploratory study shows that stage I FL is genetically heterogeneous with different underlying oncogenic pathways. Stage I FL BCL2trl– is likely STAT6 driven, whereas BCL2trl– stage III/IV appears to be more BCL6trl driven.</jats:p>

収録刊行物

  • Blood Advances

    Blood Advances 6 (18), 5482-5493, 2022-09-26

    American Society of Hematology

被引用文献 (2)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ