- 【Updated on May 12, 2025】 Integration of CiNii Dissertations and CiNii Books into CiNii Research
- Trial version of CiNii Research Knowledge Graph Search feature is available on CiNii Labs
- 【Updated on June 30, 2025】Suspension and deletion of data provided by Nikkei BP
- Regarding the recording of “Research Data” and “Evidence Data”
Genetic mixing for population management: From genetic rescue to provenancing
-
- Ary A. Hoffmann
- School of BioSciences Bio21 Institute The University of Melbourne Parkville Vic. Australia
-
- Adam D. Miller
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences Centre for Integrative Ecology Deakin University Warrnambool Vic. Australia
-
- Andrew R. Weeks
- School of BioSciences Bio21 Institute The University of Melbourne Parkville Vic. Australia
Search this article
Description
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Animal and plant species around the world are being challenged by the deleterious effects of inbreeding, loss of genetic diversity, and maladaptation due to widespread habitat destruction and rapid climate change. In many cases, interventions will likely be needed to safeguard populations and species and to maintain functioning ecosystems. Strategies aimed at initiating, reinstating, or enhancing patterns of gene flow via the deliberate movement of genotypes around the environment are generating growing interest with broad applications in conservation and environmental management. These diverse strategies go by various names ranging from genetic or evolutionary rescue to provenancing and genetic resurrection. Our aim here is to provide some clarification around terminology and to how these strategies are connected and linked to underlying genetic processes. We draw on case studies from the literature and outline mechanisms that underlie how the various strategies aim to increase species fitness and impact the wider community. We argue that understanding mechanisms leading to species decline and community impact is a key to successful implementation of these strategies. We emphasize the need to consider the nature of source and recipient populations, as well as associated risks and trade‐offs for the various strategies. This overview highlights where strategies are likely to have potential at population, species, and ecosystem scales, but also where they should probably not be attempted depending on the overall aims of the intervention. We advocate an approach where short‐ and long‐term strategies are integrated into a decision framework that also considers nongenetic aspects of management.</jats:p>
Journal
-
- Evolutionary Applications
-
Evolutionary Applications 14 (3), 634-652, 2020-11-06
Wiley
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1360016869793367424
-
- ISSN
- 17524571
-
- Data Source
-
- Crossref