Evaluation of Remote Check: A Clinical Tool for Asynchronous Monitoring and Triage of Cochlear Implant Recipients

  • Saji Maruthurkkara
    Cochlear Limited, 1 University Ave Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
  • Sasha Case
    Cochlear Limited, 1 University Ave Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
  • Riaan Rottier
    Cochlear Limited, 1 University Ave Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

抄録

<jats:sec> <jats:title>Background:</jats:title> <jats:p>A new Remote Check App permits remote self-testing of hearing function for Nucleus cochlear implant (CI) recipients and enables asynchronous review by their clinician to support patient-management decisions.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Objectives:</jats:title> <jats:p>To evaluate the Remote Check App for: (1) ease of use; (2) overall acceptance of the test battery by CI recipient or their carer in the home setting; (3) test–retest reliability of audiological threshold and speech recognition measures via wireless streaming; and (4) to compare outcomes from patient-driven measures with conventional clinician-driven measurements of aided-hearing function.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Design:</jats:title> <jats:p>Single-site, prospective, repeated-measures cohort study with 32 experienced CI users (28 adults and 4 children).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods:</jats:title> <jats:p>Participants completed self-testing using the Remote Check app at home and in the clinic. Measures include audiological, objective and subjective tests. Self-administered speech recognition in noise, via the digit triplets test (DTT) and aided thresholds, via the aided threshold test (ATT) were reassessed in free-field and by clinicians following conventional clinical protocols. Results of ATT and DTT were compared across test conditions. Completion time and perceived ease of self-driven assessments were documented. Insights from subsequent real-world experience with Remote Check are summarized and compared to the study findings.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results:</jats:title> <jats:p>Remote Check was rated as easy to use by the majority (87%) of subjects. Mean group test–retest score differences for self-administered testing within the clinic versus at-home environments were nonsignificant (<jats:italic toggle="yes">p</jats:italic> > 0.05): 1.4 dB (SD = 1.97) for ATT and 1.6 dB (SD = 1.54) for DTT. Mean group test–retest score difference for patient-driven DTT in streamed versus the free-field condition was 1.8 dB (SD = 2.02). Self-administered, streamed, ATT via Remote Check, resulted in significantly lower thresholds compared to clinician-driven warble-tone thresholds in the free-field by 6.7 dB (SD = 6.8) (<jats:italic toggle="yes">p</jats:italic> < 0.001). ATT thresholds via Remote Check were not significantly different from predicted thresholds based on the Threshold Sound Pressure Level of the sound processor.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion:</jats:title> <jats:p>Remote Check is the first CI telehealth assessment tool that uses wireless streaming to enable comprehensive, easy and reliable self-testing of hearing function by the CI recipient or their carer, in the comfort of their home. Asynchronous access to test results can assist clinicians in monitoring and triaging individuals for appropriate patient-management based on their needs. Use of remote monitoring may also help to reduce the burden of unnecessary clinic visits on clinic resources, patient travel time and associated costs. Remote Check is an important step toward addressing the current growing need for asynchronous audiological telepractice to support long-term care of CI recipients.</jats:p> </jats:sec>

収録刊行物

  • Ear & Hearing

    Ear & Hearing 43 (2), 495-506, 2021-07-27

    Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

被引用文献 (1)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ