Proton FLASH Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Symptomatic Bone Metastases

  • Anthony E. Mascia
    Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
  • Emily C. Daugherty
    Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
  • Yongbin Zhang
    Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
  • Eunsin Lee
    Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
  • Zhiyan Xiao
    Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
  • Mathieu Sertorio
    Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
  • Jennifer Woo
    Varian Medical Systems, Siemens Healthineers, Palo Alto, California
  • Lori R. Backus
    Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
  • Julie M. McDonald
    Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
  • Claire McCann
    Varian Medical Systems, Siemens Healthineers, Palo Alto, California
  • Kenneth Russell
    Varian Medical Systems, Siemens Healthineers, Palo Alto, California
  • Lisa Levine
    Varian Medical Systems, Siemens Healthineers, Palo Alto, California
  • Ricky A. Sharma
    Varian Medical Systems, Siemens Healthineers, Palo Alto, California
  • Dee Khuntia
    Varian Medical Systems, Siemens Healthineers, Palo Alto, California
  • Jeffrey D. Bradley
    Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Charles B. Simone
    Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, New York
  • John P. Perentesis
    Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
  • John C. Breneman
    Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • The FAST-01 Nonrandomized Trial

抄録

<jats:sec><jats:title>Importance</jats:title><jats:p>To our knowledge, there have been no clinical trials of ultra-high-dose-rate radiotherapy delivered at more than 40 Gy/sec, known as FLASH therapy, nor first-in-human use of proton FLASH.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>To assess the clinical workflow feasibility and treatment-related toxic effects of FLASH and pain relief at the treatment sites.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design, Setting, and Participants</jats:title><jats:p>In the FAST-01 nonrandomized trial, participants treated at Cincinnati Children’s/UC Health Proton Therapy Center underwent palliative FLASH radiotherapy to extremity bone metastases. Patients 18 years and older with 1 to 3 painful extremity bone metastases and life expectancies of 2 months or more were eligible. Patients were excluded if they had foot, hand, and wrist metastases; metastases locally treated in the 2 weeks prior; metal implants in the treatment field; known enhanced tissue radiosensitivity; and implanted devices at risk of malfunction with radiotherapy. One of 11 patients who consented was excluded based on eligibility. The end points were evaluated at 3 months posttreatment, and patients were followed up through death or loss to follow-up for toxic effects and pain assessments. Of the 10 included patients, 2 died after the 2-month follow-up but before the 3-month follow-up; 8 participants completed the 3-month evaluation. Data were collected from November 3, 2020, to January 28, 2022, and analyzed from January 28, 2022, to September 1, 2022.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Interventions</jats:title><jats:p>Bone metastases were treated on a FLASH-enabled (≥40 Gy/sec) proton radiotherapy system using a single-transmission proton beam. This is consistent with standard of care using the same prescription (8 Gy in a single fraction) but on a conventional-dose-rate (approximately 0.03 Gy/sec) photon radiotherapy system.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Main Outcome and Measures</jats:title><jats:p>Main outcomes included patient time on the treatment couch, device-related treatment delays, adverse events related to FLASH, patient-reported pain scores, and analgesic use.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>A total of 10 patients (age range, 27-81 years [median age, 63 years]; 5 [50%] male) underwent FLASH radiotherapy at 12 metastatic sites. There were no FLASH-related technical issues or delays. The average (range) time on the treatment couch was 18.9 (11-33) minutes per patient and 15.8 (11-22) minutes per treatment site. Median (range) follow-up was 4.8 (2.3-13.0) months. Adverse events were mild and consistent with conventional radiotherapy. Transient pain flares occurred in 4 of the 12 treated sites (33%). In 8 of the 12 sites (67%) patients reported pain relief, and in 6 of the 12 sites (50%) patients reported a complete response (no pain).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions and Relevance</jats:title><jats:p>In this nonrandomized trial, clinical workflow metrics, treatment efficacy, and safety data demonstrated that ultra-high-dose-rate proton FLASH radiotherapy was clinically feasible. The treatment efficacy and the profile of adverse events were comparable with those of standard-of-care radiotherapy. These findings support the further exploration of FLASH radiotherapy in patients with cancer.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Trial Registration</jats:title><jats:p>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04592887?term=NCT04592887&amp;draw=2&amp;rank=1">NCT04592887</jats:ext-link></jats:p></jats:sec>

収録刊行物

  • JAMA Oncology

    JAMA Oncology 9 (1), 62-, 2023-01-01

    American Medical Association (AMA)

被引用文献 (1)*注記

もっと見る

問題の指摘

ページトップへ