Shaking table tests of a full‐scale 10‐story reinforced‐concrete building (2015). Phase II: Seismic resisting system

  • Jae‐Do Kang
    Earthquake Disaster Mitigation Center Seoul Institute of Technology Seoul South Korea
  • Koichi Kajiwara
    Earthquake Disaster Mitigation Research Division National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience Miki Japan
  • Yusuke Tosauchi
    Fujita Technology Center Fujita Corporation Atsugi Japan
  • Eiji Sato
    Earthquake Disaster Mitigation Research Division National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience Miki Japan
  • Takahito Inoue
    Earthquake Disaster Mitigation Research Division National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience Miki Japan
  • Toshimi Kabeyasawa
    Earthquake Research Institute The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan
  • Hitoshi Shiohara
    Department of Architectural Engineering The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan
  • Takuya Nagae
    Earthquake Disaster Mitigation Research Division National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience Miki Japan
  • Toshikazu Kabeyasawa
    Department of Urban Environmental Sciences Tokyo Metropolitan University Tokyo Japan
  • Hiroshi Fukuyama
    Building Research Institute Tsukuba Japan
  • Tomohisa Mukai
    National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management Tsukuba Japan

この論文をさがす

説明

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>A 10‐story reinforced‐concrete (RC) building was subjected to a shaking table test using E‐Defense, the largest three‐dimensional earthquake simulator in the world, to estimate the effects of a flexible foundation and seismic response of a mid‐rise building. Two structural systems with different base supporting conditions were adopted for two phases of tests for comparative purposes: the first system was free‐standing with base sliding and uplifting, and the second was a conventional RC seismic resisting system with a fixed base. This paper mainly reports the test results for the conventional RC seismic resisting system with a fixed base, which comprises a moment‐resisting frame system in the longitudinal direction and a frame system with multistory shear walls in the transverse direction. The objective of this research was to confirm the seismic capacity of a mid‐rise building designed in accordance with current Japanese building standards and guidelines. Even though the story drift ratio exceeded 3% under extreme motion exceeding the design earthquake, the structure remained stable throughout the tests, satisfying the design concept of collapse prevention performance, whereas relatively severe damage was observed in the beam–column joints. Crack observations indicated massive damage sustained by the beam–column joints. The measured shear deformations at the beam–column joints accounted for more than half of the inter‐story drift at the peak response.</jats:p>

収録刊行物

参考文献 (29)*注記

もっと見る

関連プロジェクト

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ