The Prognostic Value of Lung Injury and Fibrosis Markers, KL-6, TGF-β1, FGF-2 in COVID-19 Patients

  • Hazan Karadeniz
    Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
  • Aslıhan Avanoğlu Güler
    Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
  • Hasan Selçuk Özger
    Department of Infectious Disease, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
  • Pınar Aysert Yıldız
    Department of Infectious Disease, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
  • Gonca Erbaş
    Department of Radiology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
  • Gülendam Bozdayı
    Department of Medical Microbiology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
  • Tuba Deveci Bulut
    Department of Biochemistry, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
  • Özlem Gülbahar
    Department of Biochemistry, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
  • Dilek Yapar
    Department of Public Health and Biostatistics Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
  • Hamit Küçük
    Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
  • Mehmet Akif Öztürk
    Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
  • Abdurrahman Tufan
    Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey

説明

<jats:sec><jats:title>Background:</jats:title><jats:p> Biomarkers of lung injury and interstitial fibrosis give insight about the extent of involvement and prognosis in well-known interstitial lung diseases (ILD). Serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) reflects direct alveolar injury and, transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-β1) and fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) are principal mediators of fibrosis in ILD and in almost all fibrotic diseases. In this sense, we aimed to assess associations of these biomarkers with traditional inflammatory markers and clinical course of COVID-19. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods:</jats:title><jats:p> Patients with COVID-19 who had confirmed diagnosis with SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid RT-PCR were enrolled and followed up prospectively with a standardized approach one month after diagnosis. Patients were divided into severe and non-severe groups according to National Institutes of Health criteria. Outcome was assessed for the requirement of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, long term respiratory support and death. Blood samples were collected at enrollment and serum levels of KL-6, TGF-β1, FGF-2 were determined by ELISA. Association between these markers with other prognostic markers and prognosis were analyzed. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results:</jats:title><jats:p> Overall 31 severe and 28 non-severe COVID-19 patients were enrolled and were compared with healthy control subjects (n = 30). Serum KL-6 levels in COVID-19 patients were significantly higher (median [IQR]; 11.54 [4.86] vs 8.54 [3.98] ng/mL, P = .001] and FGF-2 levels were lower (median [IQR]; 76.84 [98.2] vs 101.62 [210.6] pg/mL) compared to healthy control group. A significant correlation was found between KL-6 values and CRP, fibrinogen, d-dimer and lymphocyte counts. However, we did not find an association between these markers and subsequent severity of COVID-19, mortality and long-term prognosis. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions:</jats:title><jats:p> Serum KL-6 levels were significantly elevated at the diagnosis of COVID-19 and correlated well with the other traditional prognostic inflammatory markers. Serum levels of principal fibrosis mediators, TGF-β1, FGF-2, were not elevated at diagnosis of COVID-19, therefore did not help to anticipate long term prognosis. </jats:p></jats:sec>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (1)*注記

もっと見る

問題の指摘

ページトップへ