A comparative analysis of language choices in written peer feedback provided by high- and low-proficiency Japanese EFL students

DOI Web Site Web Site 参考文献68件
  • Sugene Kim
    Nagoya University of Commerce & Business, Japan

書誌事項

公開日
2023-09-20
資源種別
journal article
権利情報
  • https://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license
DOI
  • 10.1177/13621688231193074
公開者
SAGE Publications

この論文をさがす

説明

<jats:p> This study reports on part of a larger research project that investigates the role of students’ first language in learning English as a foreign language (EFL) in the context of Japanese higher education. Despite the prevalent use of peer review in EFL writing classes, students’ use of different languages and the effects of English proficiencies on collaborative interaction as mediated in written peer feedback remain underresearched. To add to the rather sparse literature, this study comparatively analysed peer feedback provided by high- and low-proficiency Japanese EFL students and conducted stimulated recall interviews to determine the factors affecting their language choices. The text analysis presented a stark contrast in students’ language choices stemming mainly from a difference in the type of feedback provided by each group: ‘corrective feedback’ versus ‘complimentary overall comment’. The stimulated recall interview accounts suggested that this polarization is attributable mostly to the proficiency gap between peer dyads and the affective need to contribute to the peer-review process. Inconsistent with the reports of previous studies that peer review benefits all students involved, the advanced-level participants voiced serious doubts about its effectiveness. </jats:p>

収録刊行物

参考文献 (68)*注記

もっと見る

関連プロジェクト

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ