-
- Shahida Anusha Siddiqui
- Campus Straubing for Biotechnology and Sustainability, Technical University of Munich, Essigberg 3, 94315 Straubing, Germany
-
- Sipper Khan
- Tropics and Subtropics Group, Institute of Agricultural Engineering, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
-
- Misbah Murid
- National Institute of Food Science and Technology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan
-
- Zarnab Asif
- National Institute of Food Science and Technology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan
-
- Natalya Pavlovna Oboturova
- Department of Food Technology and Engineering, North Caucasus Federal University, 355017 Stavropol, Russia
-
- Andrey Ashotovich Nagdalian
- Department of Food Technology and Engineering, North Caucasus Federal University, 355017 Stavropol, Russia
-
- Andrey Vladimirovich Blinov
- Department of Food Technology and Engineering, North Caucasus Federal University, 355017 Stavropol, Russia
-
- Salam A. Ibrahim
- North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, E. Market Street, 1601, Greensboro, NC 24711, USA
-
- Seid Mahdi Jafari
- Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan 49165, Iran
書誌事項
- 公開日
- 2022-09-01
- 権利情報
-
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- DOI
-
- 10.3390/app12178795
- 公開者
- MDPI AG
説明
<jats:p>Environmentally intense and negative consequences relateing to conventional meat production systems have induced some actors to suggest alternative meat sources. Diseases carried by animals, human perception of cruelty to animals, and public health concerns about cardiovascular diseases have provided the basis for the development of cultured meat. The current market is influenced by many factors, including regulators, affordability, religion, and media perception. The existing cultured meat market is also regulated by legislatures, affordability, consumer religion, and the media. Consumer perception is distributed across various aspects, including ethical priorities, nutritional profile of the meat consumed, age-based acceptance, gender differentiation, political orientation, land-based attitude, education status, socioeconomic factors, and familiarity factor with the existing product in the market. Inhibiting barriers reported among consumers—including low naturalness, safety, nutritional concerns, trust, neophobia, economic, and ethical approaches—should be employed as marketing tactics directly to address their respective concerns. Tissue culture, starter cells, printing, and 3D printing are some of the methods currently being used for the production of cultured meat. Similarly, many hybrid technologies are also being used to produce meat-like products to increase consumer familiarity along and market presence. Existing research frameworks have improved the previous mindset of consumers with media coverage, educational frameworks, and the textural attributes of cultured meat. Additional benefits of CUME may include being environmentally friendly with less production of greenhouse gases. However, consumer trust, affordability, improving nutritional status, and widescale adoption are just a few of the parameters that need to be addressed to enhance consumer acceptability of these products. The aim of this article was to analyze the current state of cultured meat and the marketing content challenges and strategies used to advance public acceptance of cultured meat.</jats:p>
収録刊行物
-
- Applied Sciences
-
Applied Sciences 12 (17), 8795-, 2022-09-01
MDPI AG
